Back

Extended Validation of Transport Conditions of Thawed PF24 Units

Zlobin, D.; Jerez, M.; Roberts, F.; Miller, J.; Proytcheva, M.; Smith, D.; Baykara, Y.

2026-08-14 hematology
10.64898/2026.08.12.26360319 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUND: The transport and storage conditions of thawed plasma are not strictly regulated by the FDA and applying red blood cell transport standard of 1-10 degrees Celcius to recently thawed plasma often results in high discard rates. This study evaluated the extended 120-hour (5-day) coagulation factor stability and sterility of thawed plasma frozen within 24 hours (PF24) following a 6-hour transport cooler simulation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fourteen PF24 units (8 group O, 6 group B) were thawed at 30-37 degrees Celcius and assigned as control (n=7, direct 1-6 degrees Celcius refrigeration) or experiment (n=7) units. Experiment units were held at room temperature for 30 minutes, stored in validated transport coolers for 6 hours, and then transferred to 1-6 degrees Celcius refrigeration. Measurements of temperature, prothrombin time (PT), Factor V (FV) activity, and Factor VIII (FVIII) activity were conducted at 0-, 6-, 24-, and 120-hour post-thaw. Sterility testing was performed at 0-hour and 120-hour using automated aerobic and anaerobic blood cultures. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between control and experiment units at 120-hour for mean PT (15.09 vs. 15.16 seconds, p = .44), FV activity (81.14 vs. 74.57%, p = .23), or FVIII activity (61.86 vs. 53.00%, p = .22). Delta analysis (120h-0h) confirmed equivalent factor decay rates between groups. All bacterial cultures showed no growth at 120-hour. CONCLUSION: A 6-hour cooler time of thawed PF24 does not accelerate coagulation factor degradation or compromise sterility over an extended 5-day shelf life. These findings validate flexible inventory return policies, allowing blood banks to reduce product waste.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.