Back

TRIDENT: a framework for robust multi-trait GWAS identifies 66 novel multi-trait osteoarthritis signals

wu, y.; Saafi, S.; Chen, S.; Xiong, Z.; Jung, M.; Southam, L.; Faber, B. G.; Kayser, M.; van Meurs, J. B.; Zeggini, E.; Boer, C. G.

2026-08-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.08.12.26360256 medRxiv
Show abstract

As multi-trait genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are increasingly used to identify shared genetic associations across related phenotypes, practical approaches to assess the robustness of their findings are lacking. Here we present a three-step framework (Trident) for robust multi-trait GWAS that uses an earlier, smaller GWAS meta-analysis to test whether phenotypes can be validly combined as well as the latest, largest GWAS meta-analysis of the same phenotypes for discovery, followed by translational annotation to assess disease relevance and prioritize likely effector genes. We applied Trident by using the Combined-GWAS (C-GWAS) method to osteoarthritis, a degenerative joint disease, across five osteoarthritis joint sites. Signals identified in the earlier GWAS meta-analysis showed high validation in the replication dataset, supporting the robustness of this approach. Applied to the latest and largest osteoarthritis GWAS meta-analysis, C-GWAS identified 66 novel associations not identified with conventional single-trait GWAS meta-analyses, including signals with shared and discordant effects across different joint sites. Translational annotation linked these signals to biologically plausible osteoarthritis genes and pathways. Together, we provide a practical framework for robust multi-trait GWAS that increases detection power by identifying novel signals and, by applying it to the example of osteoarthritis of five joints, refine the genetic architecture of this common disease.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.