Regenerating forests around Taï National Park sustain biodiversity despite constrained floristic recovery
Houphouët, A. D. L.; Sangne, Y. C.; Diarrassouba, A.; Ehouman, E.; Herault, B.
Show abstract
Extensive deforestation and disturbance have reshaped forest landscapes in West Africa, including areas surrounding Tai National Park, the largest remaining block of Upper Guinean rainforest. Although many degraded areas are currently undergoing regeneration, the capacity of these secondary forests to recover their biodiversity attributes remains insufficiently assessed within this park. This study quantifies the multidimensional restoration of biodiversity across 125 secondary forest plots and 15 primary forest plots representing 14,731 inventoried individuals in four sectors of the park. Using a Bayesian modelling framework, we estimate recovery trajectories of Shannon diversity, floristic composition, functional traits (wood density, leaf mass per area, seed mass), and conservation-relevant species. The different biodiversity attributes recovered at contrasting rates. Diversity was restored more rapidly ({lambda} = 0.06) than floristic composition ({lambda} = 0.03), and these recovery varied according to environmental variables. Among these, the presence of remnant trees showed the highest median on diversity (0.53 {+/-} 0.61) and floristic composition (0.37 {+/-} 0.17), promoting the rapid recovery of both attributes, followed by prior land use, particularly cocoa farming which also positively influenced the recovery of alpha diversity ({lambda} = 0.03) and floristic composition ({lambda} = 0.02). Regarding functional traits, they displayed contrasting dynamics: specific leaf area and seed mass recovered rapidly along successional gradients, whereas wood density followed a more gradual recovery trajectory. From a conservation perspective, although the proportion of IUCN Red List species remained stable along the successional gradient, old-growth indicator species were significantly more abundant in primary forests. To ensure the long-term conservation of biodiversity, protecting both primary and regenerating forests is essential to preserve the ecological resilience of this park.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Forest structure, timber species regeneration, and timber volume dynamics along a logging gradient in a lowland tropical rainforest in Africa: Implications for biodiversity conservation and sustainable timber management 94%
- Nature Forest Reserves in Tanzania and their importance for conservation 94%
- From Concrete to Canopy: Illuminating Moth Biodiversity in New York City's Urban Jungle 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Big trees drive forest structure patterns across a lowland Amazon regrowth gradient 93%
- Does rainforest biodiversity stand on the shoulders of giants? Effect of disturbances by forest elephants on trees and insects on Mount Cameroon 92%
- Predicting range shifts of three endangered endemic plants of the Khorassan-Kopet Dagh floristic province under global change 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating spatial, phylogenetic, and threat assessment data from frogs and lizards to identify areas for conservation priorities in Peninsular Malaysia 93%
- Biotic Assessment of Crowdsourced Data Defines Four Ecoregions in Thar: A Novel Approach for Citizen Engagement in Conservation 92%
- Population monitoring of snow leopards using camera trapping in Naryn State Reserve, Kyrgyzstan, between 2016 and 2019 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nature representativeness in South American protected areas: Country contrasts and conservation priorities 94%
- Tick hazard in the South Downs National Park (UK): species, distribution, key locations for future interventions, site density, habitats 92%
- Longer study length, standardized sampling techniques, and broader geographic scope leads to higher likelihood of detecting stable abundance patterns in long term black-legged tick studies 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.