Kinship, acoustic signaling, and socio-spatial structure shape shared decisions and social influence in white-nosed coatis

When individual preferences for collective outcomes diverge, cohesive animal groups often coalesce on the majority opinion. However, majority-based decision rules may be counterbalanced by other factors, particularly in heterogeneous groups with differentiated social relationships, and these factors could produce inequality in social influence. We used multi-sensor tracking collars to collect detailed and simultaneous data on the movements and vocalizations of almost all members of three wild white-nosed coati (Nasua narica) groups, and analyzed 2,401 individual decisions between conflicting travel directions. Decision-making was shared: individuals favored directions that had majority support, and we found evidence that they used acoustic signals and movement cues to infer majority support. Individuals were also more likely to choose directions favored by closer kin and by groupmates in more frontward spatial positions. Although decisions were shared, influence was not equally distributed across individuals. During directional conflicts, individuals who were more likely to form majorities or who were advantaged by frontward spatial positions had higher influence over travel direction. By explicitly linking decisions by individual followers to emergent patterns of influence among potential leaders, our results suggest that influence is a complex product of higher-order interactions that are likely dependent on group demography and socio-spatial structure.