Neurofeedback Training on Motor Cancellation Enhances Peripheral but not Cortical Beta Band Oscillations
Abbagnano, E.; Meme, B.; Pascual Valdunciel, A.; Zhao, Y.; Ibanez, J.; Farina, D.
Show abstract
Beta oscillations (13-30 Hz) are a prominent sensorimotor neural rhythm and an important biomarker in neurorehabilitation. These oscillations propagate along the corticospinal pathway and are expressed in the discharge patterns of spinal motor neurons, enabling the assessment of corticomuscular coupling. Moreover, peripheral beta band oscillations have recently emerged as a potential control signal for motor augmentation interfaces. However, it remains unclear whether peripheral beta activity simply reflects cortical oscillations or is partly shaped by peripheral mechanisms, and to what extent it can be voluntarily controlled. To address these questions, we developed a 10-day neurofeedback protocol in which participants learned to up-regulate peripheral beta band activity. Subjects were trained to exploit movement cancellation, a behaviour naturally associated with increased cortical and muscle beta band activity, as a two-state strategy to voluntarily modulate peripheral beta band power. Each session included a guided familiarization phase based on a GO/NO-GO task, in which participants familiarized with movement cancellation through guided visual cues, followed by an asynchronous control phase in which they self-initiated the same strategy without external guidance to increase peripheral beta band activity in a target window. Participants progressively improved their ability to voluntarily modulate peripheral beta band activity. Peripheral beta band power during movement cancellation increased significantly across training days in both the familiarization and asynchronous control phases. Intramuscular coherence in the beta band also increased, indicating enhanced common synaptic input to the motor neuron pool in this band. In contrast, cortical beta power and corticomuscular coherence remained unchanged. Together, these findings demonstrate that peripheral beta band activity is a dynamic neural feature that can be voluntarily shaped through training, supporting its potential as a non-invasive control signal for future neurorehabilitation and motor augmentation technologies.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sensory stimulation enhances phantom limb perception and movement decoding 94%
- Lempel-Ziv complexity of simultaneous surface electromyography and magnetomyography during muscle fatigue 93%
- Identifying alterations in hand movement coordination from chronic stroke survivors using a wearable high-density EMG sleeve 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Plasticity of interhemispheric motor cortex connectivity induced by brain state-dependent cortico-cortical paired-associative stimulation 93%
- Pre-movement changes in sensorimotor beta oscillations predict motor adaptation drive. 93%
- An acute session of motor imagery training induces use-dependent plasticity. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A different state of mind: neural activity related to volitionally up- versus downregulating cortical excitability 95%
- Neurofeedback linked suppression of subthalamic beta oscillations speeds up movement initialisation in Parkinsonian Patients 95%
- The control and training of single motor units in isometric tasks are constrained by a common synaptic input signal 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A BCI-based vibrotactile neurofeedback training improves motor cortical excitability during motor imagery 93%
- A deep CNN framework for neural drive estimation from HD-EMG across contraction intensities and joint angles 92%
- Assessing the utility of Fronto-Parietal and Cingulo-Opercular networks in predicting the trial success of brain-machine interfaces for upper extremity stroke rehabilitation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.