Symmetry breaking and social coordination in children: Using group theory to understand emergent patterns of multi-agent coordination
Kijima, A.; Okumura, M.; Shima, H.; Kallen, R. W.; Richardson, M. J.; Yamamoto, Y.
Show abstract
Predicting patterns of behavioural coordination that emerge in small interacting groups is challenging because goal-directed social action is shaped by complex reciprocal and compensatory dynamics. In this study, we examined whether formal symmetry principles derived from group theory could explain coordination patterns among children performing a triadic jumping task. We investigated how geometric symmetries of the task environment and dispositional (a)symmetries associated with leader-follower tendencies jointly constrain collective behaviour. Forty-seven children were classified into symmetric or asymmetric triads based on teacher evaluations of leadership dispositions. Each triad completed multiple trials of a synchronized jumping game requiring movement between adjacent hoops arranged in triangular or square configurations. Results showed that temporal asymmetries in inter-child movement (first, second, or last to jump) were consistent with group-theoretic predictions. In triangular configurations, observed asymmetries corresponded to the highest-order subgroup defined by task and dispositional symmetries. These findings demonstrate that environmental symmetry exerts a hierarchically dominant constraint on collective coordination, within which actor dispositional (a)symmetries further modulate emerging patterns.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- I judge you by your profit: Judgments of effort exerted by selfand others are influenced by task contingent rewards 93%
- Processing of novel food reveal payoff and rank-biased social learning in a wild primate 91%
- Predicting social experience from dyadic interaction dynamics: the BallGame, a novel paradigm to study social engagement 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.