Back

Single-cell spatial multi-omic characterization of the tumour microenvironment in transformed follicular lymphoma

Wu, S.; Lee, E.; Fratzscher, A.-S.; Lytle, A.; Martin, S. D.; Hsu, T.; Telenius, A.; Yin, Y.; Fong, A.; Rai, S.; Fujisawa, M.; Cheung, H.; Aparicio, S.; Huntsman, D. G.; Aoki, T.; Scott, D. W.; Steidl, C.; Roth, A.

2026-08-18 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.11.743383 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Histological examination of follicular lymphoma (FL) biopsies remains the cornerstone for diagnostic grading of FL. Single-cell sequencing approaches, while transcriptomically rich, require tissue dissociation and lose the native spatial context that underpins FL transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To investigate the spatial interplay between malignant B-cells and the tumour microenvironment (TME) across disease states, we performed subcellular single-cell spatial transcriptomics and spatial proteomics on 12 paired pre/post-transformation samples and 10 non-transforming FL controls, integrated with matched single-cell whole genome sequencing (scWGS). Our analysis reveals that transformation is accompanied by a shift toward B-cell-predominant stromal and immunosuppressive cellular neighbourhoods, where the magnitude of expansion correlates with time to transformation. Prior to transformation, immunomodulatory Galectin-9 interactions move from the intra-follicular core to the extra-follicular space. Integration with scWGS demonstrates that high copy-number instability in malignant B-cells is associated with reduced supportive T-cell niches and intensified immunoregulatory crosstalk at the transformed state. Collectively, our multi-omic analysis characterizes TME remodeling during FL transformation, contributing to a refined disease evolution model.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.