Back

Dominant truncating variants in KAT6A cause two neurodevelopmental disorders with opposite gene regulatory and metabolic changes.

Nava, A. A.; Perez-Rodriguez, Y.; Hsieh, T.-C.; Byrne, A. S.; Krall, A. S.; Freudenberg, J.; Mansooralavi, N.; Pandey, V.; Stiles, L.; Beninca, C.; Li, J.-M.; Choufani, S.; Singh, M.; Moosa, S.; Valenzuela, I.; Tizzano, E. F.; Piton, A.; Lacombe, D.; Perrin, L.; Marquez, J.; Ortigoza-Escobar, J. D.; Ahmadyar, S.; Pimentel, H.; Wohlschlegel, J. A.; de la Torre-Ubieta, L.; Christofk, H. R.; Weksberg, R.; Lowry, W. E.; Arboleda, V.

2026-08-14 genetic and genomic medicine
10.64898/2026.08.11.26358095 medRxiv
Show abstract

Arboleda-Tham Syndrome (ARTHS), caused by truncating variants in KAT6A, is currently diagnosed as a single neurodevelopmental syndrome with variable severity of intellectual disability and multi-system findings. Here, we reveal that this clinical stratification reflects fundamentally distinct molecular mechanisms driven by variant position in the gene. Using patient-derived iPSCs and multi-omics profiling, we demonstrate that early-truncating variants (exons 1-15) cause loss-of-function via nonsense-mediated decay (NMD), while late-truncating variants (exons 16-17) that escape NMD cause gain-of-function effects. These opposite mechanisms are reflected in distinctive facial gestalt features and DNA-methylation episignatures and invert the direction of change across neuronal gene regulation, metabolism, and mitochondrial physiology. This mechanistic distinction enables precision therapeutics: late-truncating variants are amenable to KAT6A inhibition, while early-truncating variants require loss-of-function rescue. Variant-level stratification is therefore essential: mechanistic understanding, not gene-level diagnosis alone, is prerequisite for developing rational therapeutic strategies in rare Mendelian disease.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.