Low-frequency neural responses synchronize to distinct structural rather than lexical features during sentence comprehension
Martorell, J.; Mancini, S.; Paz-Alonso, P. M.; Carreiras, M.; Molinaro, N.
Show abstract
Language comprehension involves the integration of single words (lexical units) into phrases and sentences (multi-word structures). Previous frequency-tagging studies have found that low-frequency neural responses synchronize to the frequency of multi-word structures. However, it is currently unclear how exactly structural and lexical processes jointly impact these synchronization findings. The present magnetoencephalography experiment implemented the frequency-tagging paradigm in the visual modality with written words to investigate neural synchronization to multi-word sentences varying in internal structure (reversed word orders between verb-initial Spanish and verb-final Basque sentences) and in lexical content (real words and pseudo words). We find converging evidence that neural responses largely synchronize to structural rather than lexical features. This was observed as robust phase synchronization strength to the frequency of sentences containing reversed structures, with certain lexical modulations depending on language-specific structural features. Crucially, we also found shifted phase angle dynamics between the reversed structures of Spanish and Basque sentences independently of word-level lexical characteristics. Together, these findings suggest that neural synchronization to multi-word structures is largely driven by distinct structural features operating via two segregated neural dimensions: frequency coding for the coarser aspects (i.e., timescale/duration) and phase representing the finer-grained aspects (i.e., internal structure) of multi-word structures. Our findings thus advance key insights into the core components of the neural mechanisms supporting language comprehension. HighlightsO_LINeural synchronization to sentences is driven by structural (not lexical) features. C_LIO_LIRobust sentence-frequency synchronization across languages varying in structure. C_LIO_LIPhase angle is selectively sensitive to cross-linguistic structural differences. C_LIO_LILexical modulations depend on language-specific structure. C_LIO_LIStructure synchronization segregates into two dimensions: frequency and phase. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictive Neural Computations Support Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence from MEG and Competitor Priming 95%
- Dimensionality and ramping: Signatures of sentence integration in the dynamics of brains and deep language models 95%
- Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diverging Neural Dynamics for Syntactic Structure Building in Naturalistic Speaking and Listening 95%
- Constructed languages are processed by the same brain mechanisms as natural languages 95%
- Bilingual language processing relies on shared semantic representations that are modulated by each language 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Language beyond the language system: dorsal visuospatial pathways support processing of demonstratives and spatial language during naturalistic fast fMRI 95%
- From acoustic to linguistic analysis of temporal speech structure: acousto-linguistic transformation during speech perception using speech quilts. 95%
- Prediction-error signals to violated expectations about person identity and head orientation are doubly-dissociated across the dorsal and ventral visual streams 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.