Back

Circuit-specific reorganization of hippocampal-entorhinal-prefrontal subnetworks supports memory recall across the lifespan

Atucha, E.; Kayumova, R.; Fürst, C.; Sauvage, M.

2026-08-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.10.743925 bioRxiv
Show abstract

How memories reorganize across brain circuits as they age remains a central question in systems neuroscience. Systems consolidation is thought to progressively shift memory reliance from the hippocampus to distributed cortical networks, yet the contribution of cortical regions beyond the prefrontal cortex and the nature of this shift remains unclear. Here we define the circuit-level organization of remote memory recall across entorhinal, prefrontal, and hippocampal subregions. Using high-resolution activity mapping combined with causal manipulations that leverage natural memory decay, we adapted a murine object-location paradigm to examine memory recall across the lifespan. We find that recall of early remote memories (1 month) selectively depends on a LEC-hippocampal (CA1/CA3) circuit, whereas recall of older memories (6-12 months) recruits a distinct and broader network involving both LEC and MEC together with ACC and CA1. These findings reveal a temporally ordered, circuit-specific reconfiguration of hippocampo-cortical networks and identify the EC as a dynamic hub in remote memory retrieval. Our results refine prevailing systems consolidation theories by showing that memory consolidation is a circuit-specific and temporally ordered process, rather than a passive gradual phenomenon, and position the EC as a central and dynamic component of remote memory retrieval alongside the PFC. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=123 SRC="FIGDIR/small/743925v1_ufig.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (30K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@11d2922org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@177b02borg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@cf0a11org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9e0668_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.