Back

MRI-free OPM-MEG recovers medial temporal lobe theta during scene imagination

Thornberry, C.; Math, P.; Cohen Serra, M.; Seymour, R.; Nolan, C.; Whelan, R.

2026-08-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.10.743897 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Optically pumped magnetometer magnetoencephalography (OPM-MEG) offers a wearable, movement-tolerant alternative to conventional cryogenic MEG, placing sensors closer to the scalp and, in principle, improving sensitivity to deep sources. This is advantageous for examining subcortical structures that are affected by ageing, disorders and disease, such as the hippocampus. However, it remains unclear whether well-established activity (such as the attenuation of theta oscillations during the imagination of novel scenes) can be recovered from the medial temporal lobe (MTL) with OPM-MEG, and whether an individual structural MRI is required. Here, fifteen adults completed a scene imagination task. Initially we applied a 12-parameter template warping coregistration pipeline to the full sample. Following source reconstruction, we recovered the expected attenuation of theta (4-8 Hz) power during scene imagination compared to a counting baseline, with a significant cluster of activity peaking in the left parahippocampal gyrus. The clusters centre of mass was localised to the left hippocampus (t = -3.55, p = 0.048, whole-brain FWE-corrected) and was mostly confined to the left medial temporal lobe. We further supported our findings by using an individual T1-weighted MRI reconstruction pipeline in six participants who had these scans available. The two approaches produced similar whole-brain topographies and localised the peak MTL theta effect to left hippocampus, with temporal-lobe conjunction centroids 3-mm apart. These findings provide evidence that the theta attenuation of the scene construction network can be recovered at the group level with OPM-MEG, without an individual MRI.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.