Designing to Implement Genomics Informed ASCVD Risk Assessment: Patient and Clinician Perspectives about Identifying and Managing the Underlying Causes of Severe Hypercholesterolemia
Morgan, K. M.; Campbell-Salome, G.; Salvati, Z. M.; Kunnmann, M.; Cawley, D.; Carr, L.; Ceballos, L.; Gidding, S. S.; Kenny, E. E.; Kontorovich, A. R.; Naib, T.; Oetjens, M. T.; Pejaver, V.; Suckiel, S. A.; Tomey, M. I.; Jones, L. K.; Hallquist, M. L. G.
Show abstract
Introduction: Severe hypercholesterolemia has four primary causes: monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), polygenic hypercholesterolemia (PRS), severely elevated Lp(a) concentration, and hypercholesterolemia due to environmental/lifestyle/behavioral factors (i.e., no known genetic etiology). Here, we explore patient and clinician perspectives about the identification and management of each of these causes. Methods: Patients with severe hypercholesterolemia with a primary language of English or Spanish and clinicians (primary care, genetic counseling, cardiology) across two health systems (Geisinger, Mount Sinai) participated in semi-structured interviews. Analysis was completed using an a priori codebook informed by Proctor?s implementation outcomes to identify themes influencing the identification and management of the underlying causes of severe hypercholesterolemia. Results: A total of 28 patients and 25 clinicians participated. Patients emphasized the importance of receiving results directly from their clinician, requested take-home resources that mirrored the information from their clinician, were motivated to seek multidisciplinary care, and anticipated all results would be actionable, but that high-risk PRS and elevated Lp(a) may require more support (e.g., specialists, education) to act on. Clinicians stressed the importance of integrating workflows (e.g., test ordering) with the electronic health record, highlighted LDL-C levels and multidisciplinary care coordination as key to management, explained how they would tailor care to individual patients, and expressed a more limited understanding of Lp(a) and PRS result types based on their clinical experiences and, therefore, hesitation about the recommended clinical actions. Conclusions: Patients and clinicians identified complementary determinants influencing the identification and management of the underlying cause of severe hypercholesterolemia. Participants welcomed risk information and requested a higher level of informational support and specialty expertise to appropriately manage high Lp(a) and PRS results. Integrating genomic information into risk assessments will require a partnership between general practitioners and specialists to provide a multidisciplinary approach to the identification and management of the underlying causes of severe hypercholesterolemia.
Matching journals
The top 13 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Empowering Healthcare Professionals in West Africa □ A Feasibility Study and Qualitative Assessment of a Dietary Screening Tool to Identify Adults at High Risk of Hypertension 92%
- Patterns of Adherence to Home BP Monitoring in the e-Framingham Heart Study 92%
- Comparison of WHO laboratory-based and non-laboratory-based CVD risk Charts among Hypertensive Adults Attending Primary Healthcare Centers in West Africa Sub-region 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predictors of Arterial Stiffness in Adolescents and Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study 91%
- Vitamin B12 and Risk of Diabetes: New insight from Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses of the China Stroke Primary Prevention Trial (CSPPT) 89%
- Time In Range, as measured by continuous glucose monitor, as a predictor of microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes– A systemic review 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of An Impedance Cardiography Guided Treatment Strategy to Improve Blood Pressure Control in A Real-World Setting: Results from A Pilot Pragmatic Clinical Trial 90%
- Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: Rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) Randomised Controlled Trial 90%
- Protective lipid-lowering genetic variants in healthy older individuals without coronary heart disease 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Population genomic screening leads to improved lipid management in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia 92%
- Validation of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for coronary artery disease in French Canadians 92%
- Evaluation of Women with Peripartum or Dilated Cardiomyopathy and Their First-Degree Relatives: The DCM Precision Medicine Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of decision rules models to stratify coronary artery disease, diabetes, and hypertension risk in preventive care: cohort study of returning UK Biobank participants 92%
- Defining the Critical Components of Informed Consent for Genetic Testing: A Delphi Study 89%
- Intersections between copper, β-arrestin-1, calcium, FBXW7, CD17, insulin resistance and atherogenicity mediate depression and anxiety due to type 2 diabetes mellitus: a nomothetic network approach 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.