Back

Representations of Pitch and Timbre of Instrument Sounds in the Inferior Colliculus

Fritzinger, J. B.; Carney, L. H.

2026-08-18 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.09.743816 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeThe neural representation of pitch and timbre in complex sounds has previously been studied using synthetic, controlled stimuli to investigate underlying encoding mechanisms. These studies provide information about how single attributes of sound are represented in the inferior colliculus (IC), a critical hub of the auditory pathway where neurons are sensitive to stimulus periodicity and spectral shape, giving rise to representations of pitch and timbre, respectively. However, there is a gap in understanding how natural sounds with both pitch and timbre attributes, such as instrument sounds, are represented in the IC. MethodsIn this study, extracellular recordings were made in the IC of awake rabbits in response to natural instrument stimuli varying in fundamental frequency (F0) to determine how instrument identity (timbre) and F0 (pitch) are represented in IC neurons. ResultsUsing decoding models for instrument identification, we found that instrument identity was redundantly encoded in a population of neurons with diverse rate and timing characteristics. F0 identification using decoding models trained on single-neuron rate responses was poor, but the population of rate responses contained enough information to identify F0 reliably. F0 information was also encoded in single-neuron temporal responses up to 196 Hz. F0 identification from a population of temporal responses was accurate up to approximately 900 Hz, but accuracy decreased at high F0s. For the task in which F0 was identified based on responses to both oboe and bassoon stimuli that had overlapping F0s, performance decreased compared to F0 identification based on responses to a single instrument. ConclusionThis result supports the hypothesis that pitch and timbre information are encoded jointly in the IC.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.