Back

HaloUMI: Physics-informed analysis of inhibition halo assays

Pembery, A.; Nadir, H. H.; MacDonald, C.; Leake, M. C.

2026-08-13 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.08.743694 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Quantification of microbial growth inhibition is central to assays ranging from antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria to sensitivity of yeasts to antifungal therapeutics. Classical analysis approaches derive from zone-of-inhibition (termed halo) formats using filter paper discs, spanning methods from laser detection to machine learning. However, these tools struggle with non-uniform halos, fail to account for lawn density variability despite its experimental influence, and lack accessible, reproducible code. Here, we present Halo Unbiased Measurement of growth Inhibition (HaloUMI); an open-source Python graphical user interface for automated, high-throughput analysis of lawn-based microbial assays. HaloUMI integrates robust image processing with physics-informed models to quantify inhibition zones irrespective of shape, enabling accurate segmentation of uniform and irregular halo phenotypes. This analysis pipeline incorporates the critical correction for spatial heterogeneity in lawn density, improving reproducibility across experimental conditions. The software enhances usability without sacrificing precision, allowing rapid batch processing and intuitive parameter control. HaloUMI can be applied to multiple assay types, including yeast toxin halo, microbial mating, and conventional filter paper disc assays. It yields high-precision measurement of halo size and morphology, with improved consistency compared to standard thresholding and circular fitting. By combining accessibility, flexibility, and biophysical modelling, HaloUMI provides a quantitative framework for irregularly shaped halos of lawns of varying growth potential, enabling generalisable analysis of broad microbial interactions. O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=84 SRC="FIGDIR/small/743694v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1bd7c88org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@13ac9b6org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@9108e1org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1de06bd_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.