Benchmarking AI-generated structural ensembles of membrane proteins against physics-based modelling
Clifton, B. R.; Grieve, A. G.; Corey, R. A.
Show abstract
Proteins dynamically switch between a continuum of interconverting conformational states, and understanding these structural dynamics is important for understanding protein function and for developing therapeutics. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulations can provide insight into protein conformational ensembles, but sampling rare conformational states can require substantial computational resources. The recent development of AI-based approaches for generating protein conformational ensembles, such as the Biomolecular Emulator (BioEmu), offers a potential alternative, although it remains unclear whether these approaches can accurately capture the conformational landscapes, especially for special cases such as membrane proteins. Here, we assess the ability of BioEmu to model the conformational dynamics of a model membrane protein, the bacterial rhomboid intramembrane proteases GlpG. We find that BioEmu generates a range of conformations corresponding to both open and closed states of the rhomboid lateral gate, including states associated with different stages of the catalytic cycle. These conformations broadly correspond to states sampled during microsecond-timescale MD simulations, although BioEmu does not reproduce the full conformational landscape observed using MD. BioEmu also samples substantial conformational heterogeneity within the soluble domains of rhomboids, which are highly flexible and poorly represented in experimental structures. Overall, our findings demonstrate that BioEmu can generate plausible conformational ensembles for relatively large, six-and seven-pass membrane proteins, sampling rare states at a fraction of the computational cost of conventional MD simulations. These results suggest that AI-based ensemble generation could provide an accessible approach for exploring membrane protein dynamics and complement conventional molecular modelling approaches.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AI-Based Methods for Cryptic Pocket Detection Are Fast and Qualitative Compared to Quantitatively Predictive Simulations 96%
- Coupling of conformational switches in calcium sensor unraveled with local Markov models and transfer entropy 95%
- Toward Accurate RNA Folding Thermodynamics: Evaluation of Enhanced Sampling Methods for Force Field Benchmarking 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- How Well Do Molecular Dynamics Force Fields Model Peptides? A Systematic Benchmark Across Diverse Folding Behaviors 95%
- A Unified De Novo Approach for Predicting the Structures of Ordered and Disordered Proteins 94%
- An interaction between the transmembrane domains of Streptococcus pyogenes sortase A and its endogenous substrate M protein revealed by molecular dynamics simulations 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.