Back

Collateral Sensitivity Strongly Connected Components in Real-World Clinical Surveillance Data: Retrospective Detection of Evolutionary Traps in WHO Priority Pathogens

Goodman, J.

2026-08-10 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.07.743632 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Collateral sensitivity (CS) - resistance to one antibiotic inducing hypersensitivity to another - offers an evolutionary trap for multidrug-resistant pathogens. A strongly connected component (SCC) in the directed CS graph is a closed cycle in which every drug is reachable from every other. Prior evidence for CS SCCs is exclusively in vitro. We mined 104,337 susceptibility records from BV-BRC spanning four WHO critical-priority pathogens (Klebsiella pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa; 18,821 isolates), using Fisher's exact tests with Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction, Tarjan's algorithm, and permutation testing (n = 1,000). Two species yielded qualifying SCCs. In K. pneumoniae (4,286 isolates), a 3-node SCC - imipenem, meropenem, tetracycline - was detected (empirical p = 0.001); both carbapenem-tetracycline edges are bidirectional (OR = 1.81-1.82, q < 0.002, n > 850 per edge). In E. coli (6,720 isolates), a bidirectional 2-node SCC links colistin and cefotaxime (OR = 10.13, 95% CI 2.82-46.12, q = 0.042, n = 87; permutation p = 0.008); with a fragility index of 1, we report it as a hypothesis, not an established effect size. The carbapenem signal is tetracycline-specific: tigecycline shows co-resistance (OR < 0.35), as its distinct RamA/AcrAB-TolC mechanism predicts. ORs of 2.2-2.7 persisted across independent year bands (2009-2014). S. aureus returned no qualifying SCC, but that null is power-limited: only 8% of testable pairs could detect the K. pneumoniae effect size. Prior clinical analyses characterised pairwise and three-way collateral effects; to our knowledge these are the first closed CS cycles identified in clinical surveillance data, motivating experimental follow-up.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.