Back

Multiple Nested Distributed Language Networks in the Human Brain

Du, J.; Billot, A.; Sun, W.; Hickok, G.; Eldaief, M. C.; Buckner, R. L.

2026-08-08 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.07.743553 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Brain regions specialized for language have been extensively described, yet their arrangement into one or multiple networks remains debated. Using precision functional mapping across three independent cohorts of intensively scanned individuals (22 individuals scanned over 216 separate MRI sessions), we dissociated two nested left-lateralized perisylvian networks: an intermediate language network (intLANG) and an anatomically distinct association language network (aLANG). intLANG is anchored to precentral speech areas and the Sylvian parietal-temporal area (Spt), whereas aLANG surrounds intLANG and extends into higher-order prefrontal and temporal association cortices. The two networks can be fully recapitulated by functional connectivity from adjacent cerebellar regions, indicating that they are segregated, brain-wide networks. Task-based analyses further reveal that intLANG and aLANG are functionally distinct: intLANG responds robustly during rhyme judgments and nonword reading that emphasize phonology, whereas aLANG is preferentially recruited during meaning-based sentence processing. These findings indicate that human language engages nested distributed networks each specialized for distinct components of language processing: a lower-order network biased toward phonology, and a surrounding association network that subserves higher-order syntax and semantics. This nested organization is similar to other brain systems suggesting a shared hierarchical motif that may give rise to specialized cognitive functions across the human brain.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.