Menstrual cycle phase length variation is associated with daily symptom burden
Kogelman, L. J. A.; Westergaard, D.; Banasik, K.; Svarre Nielsen, H.; Folkmann Hansen, T.
Show abstract
Menstrual symptoms vary across the cycle, yet most research assumes a normative 28-day cycle with fixed phase durations, obscuring the physiological relevance of natural cycle variation. Using the mcPHASES dataset, we characterised cycle and phase length variation across 96 menstrual cycles from 37 participants, with ovulation timing estimated from daily urinary luteinizing hormone measurements using a Bayesian hierarchical model, and examined associations with daily symptoms in a subset of 64 cycles from 35 participants with complete symptom data. Twelve physical, mental, and behavioural symptom domains were modelled using Bayesian ordinal regression, with posterior uncertainty in phase-length predictors propagated via a measurement error framework. Total cycle length was not associated with daily symptom burden, except sleep disturbances. By contrast, phase length decomposition revealed systematic associations across multiple domains: longer menstrual phase length was broadly associated with greater symptom intensity spanning physical, gastrointestinal, affective, and sleep domains; longer luteal phase duration was associated with greater fatigue and more frequent headaches, but lower sore breast intensity and lower stress; and longer follicular phase duration and later ovulation were each associated with greater sore breast intensity and more frequent mood swings. These associations require knowledge of actual ovulation timing and cannot be recovered from cycle length alone, indicating that the common assumption of a fixed 14-day luteal phase introduces systematic misclassification of hormonal exposure. Daily symptom intensity was also predominantly person-specific, with cycle phase explaining little of the between-person variance across most symptoms. These findings indicate that calendar-based phase assignment is insufficient for research and clinical assessment of hormone-sensitive conditions, and that person-specific baselines, rather than population-level phase averages, are needed for clinically meaningful symptom monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Estrogen and COVID-19 symptoms: associations in women from the COVID Symptom Study 92%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 92%
- Assessing the relationship between menstrual products and reproductive and urogenital tract infections (RUTIs): a systematic review evaluating the evidence and recommendations for future research 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Ultradian Rhythms in Heart Rate Variability and Distal Body TemperatureAnticipate the Luteinizing Hormone Surge Onset 95%
- Clustering of >145,000 Symptom Logs Reveals Distinct Pre, Peri, and Post Menopausal Phenotypes 95%
- Chronicling menstrual cycle patterns across the reproductive lifespan with real world data 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.