Back

Time-Resolved Phenotyping Reveals Heterogeneous Rice Seed Germination Dynamics in Shallow-Water Culture

Zhao, J.; Ma, Y.

2026-08-10 plant biology
10.64898/2026.08.07.743436 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Germination percentage is an endpoint measure and therefore does not describe when an individual seed begins visible growth or how rapidly its radicle and plumule expand. We developed a time-resolved phenotyping workflow to quantify rice seed germination continuously in shallow-water culture. A single industrial camera moved along a 1 m rail and imaged three culture boxes at 1 h intervals for up to 80 h. The archive comprised 1,062 full-frame images and 6,372 seed-level repeated observations under the six-seed field-of-view configuration. A physical grid maintained seed identity through time and enabled individual regions of interest to be extracted. Whole-seed foregrounds were obtained with a pretrained U2-Net, and a masked RGB intensity rule separated newly emerging tissue from the darker hull. For each tracked seed, projected emerging-tissue area and interval growth rate were calculated. Three representative normally germinating seeds first showed measurable tissue at 48 h, yet subsequently followed distinct trajectories: final projected areas ranged from 2,605 to 4,700 pixels and peak interval growth rates ranged from 106.88 to 287.92 pixels h-1. B-1 accumulated 63.71% of its final visible area during 72-80 h, whereas B-3 accumulated 73.51% during 60-72 h. Thus, seeds with the same observed emergence interval can differ substantially in the timing and magnitude of post-emergence expansion. The workflow converts repeated images into biologically interpretable temporal phenotypes and provides a basis for nondestructive studies of rice seed vigor and germination heterogeneity.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.