Performance of a Self-Supervised Pretrained Neural Network for Orthopedic Radiograph Classification
Bagchi, R.; Yee, N. J.; Kwon, J. Y.; Taseh, A.; Ashkani-Esfahani, S.
Show abstract
Purpose To evaluate whether domain-adaptive self-supervised pretraining on musculoskeletal radiographs improves fracture classification and attribution faithfulness relative to ImageNet-pretrained baselines. Materials and Methods This study (June 2025 to May 2026) used previously acquired radiographs to compare three ResNet-50 initializations: supervised ImageNet pretraining (control), self-supervised ImageNet pretraining (DINO), and DINO with additional domain-adapted pretraining on 44,029 musculoskeletal radiographs (DINO-Ortho). All models underwent supervised fine-tuning in three experiments: in-distribution (MURA and FracAtlas datasets), out-of-distribution (an external dataset of 5,365 calcaneal radiographs from 1,775 patients), and initial weights (calcaneal radiographs only). Metrics included sensitivity, specificity, test accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and Cohen's kappa; attribution faithfulness was quantified using Remove and Debias scores from Grad-CAM saliency maps. Comparisons used DeLong and Friedman tests. Results Classification performance did not differ significantly between DINO-Ortho and either baseline in any experiment (DINO-Ortho AUROC, 0.89 in-distribution and 0.95 with initial weights). All three models discriminated poorly out-of-distribution (control, 0.59; DINO, 0.57; DINO-Ortho, 0.58). DINO-Ortho showed significantly higher attribution faithfulness than both baselines in all three experiments, including out-of-distribution (25.39 vs -10.41 and 2.14; P < .001) and initial weights (20.88 vs 11.51 and 1.27; P < .001). Qualitative rankings favored DINO-Ortho but did not differ significantly. Conclusion Domain-adapted self-supervised pretraining on musculoskeletal radiographs improved attribution faithfulness while maintaining classification performance comparable to ImageNet-pretrained baselines; no model generalized adequately to external radiographs without task-specific fine-tuning.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Investigating the relationship between internal spinal alignment and back shape in patients with scoliosis using PCdare: a comparative, reliability and validation study 93%
- Enhancing Semantic Segmentation in Chest X-Ray Images through Image Preprocessing: ps-KDE for Pixel-wise Substitution by Kernel Density Estimation 92%
- Development and validation of FootNet; a new kinematic algorithm to improve foot-strike and toe-off detection in treadmill running 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automatic Generation of Personalised Skeletal Models of the Lower Limb from Three-Dimensional Bone Geometries 93%
- Moving outside the lab: markerless motion capture accurately quantifies sagittal plane kinematics during the vertical jump 91%
- Modeling and Prediction of Body Segment Inertial Properties of Sheep from Tomographic Imaging 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Pairwise learning of MRI scans using a convolutional Siamese network for prediction of knee pain 93%
- Fully automatic segmentation of craniomaxillofacial CT scans for computer-assisted orthognathic surgery planning using the nnU-Net framework 92%
- Assessing GPT-4 Multimodal Performance in Radiological Image Analysis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating Multidimensional Data Analytics for Precision Diagnosis of Chronic Low Back Pain 91%
- Tracking And Predicting COVID-19 Radiological Trajectory Using Deep Learning On Chest X-Rays: Initial Accuracy Testing 91%
- Mechanical Metric for Skeletal Biomechanics Derived from Spectral Analysis of Stiffness matrix 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparing performance of deep convolutional neural network with orthopaedic surgeons on identification of total hip prosthesis design from plain radiographs 96%
- Selective ensemble methods for deep learning segmentation of major vessels in invasive coronary angiography 89%
- Fully Automated Explainable Abdominal CT Contrast Media Phase Classification Using Organ Segmentation and Machine Learning 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.