Safety and immunogenicity of recombinant hepatitis E vaccine in healthy pregnant women between 14 and 34 weeks of gestation and non-pregnant women of reproductive age: Protocol for a Phase II, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
Song, K. R.; Nisar, I.; Lee, J.; Yang, L.; Kim, D. R.; Riskiana, A.; Telele, N. F.; Hotwani, A. F.; Ansari, N.; Nausheen, S.; Sheikh, L.; Chen, W.; Yu, X.; Wang, R.; Blunt, M.; Talaat, K. R.; Kmush, B.; Jehan, F.; Lynch, J. A.
Show abstract
Introduction Hepatitis E virus (HEV) in pregnancy is associated with high maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. The safety and efficacy of the recombinant protein HEV vaccine (HEV239, Hecolin) have been established in non-pregnant adult populations but there is limited information among pregnant women. This trial has two co-primary objectives: 1) to assess pregnancy-related and/or serious safety events among pregnant women between 14 and 34 weeks of gestation receiving two Hecolin doses four weeks apart compared to placebo recipients, and 2) to determine immune non-inferiority of pregnant recipients of two Hecolin doses four weeks apart compared to non-pregnant women. Methods and Analysis This is a multi-site, randomized, observer-blinded, placebo-controlled vaccine safety and immunogenicity trial in pregnant women and non-pregnant women of reproductive age in Karachi, Pakistan. A total of 2,358 healthy women will be enrolled, including 2,208 pregnant women between 14 and 34 weeks of gestation, who will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio (stratified by gestational age, 14-27 and 28-34 weeks) to receive either Hecolin or a normal saline placebo in two doses administered 1 month apart during pregnancy and a third dose administered postpartum, approximately 5 months after the second dose. A third arm of 150 non-pregnant women aged 16-45 years will receive Hecolin on 0, 1, and 6 months. The co-primary outcomes will be (i) the proportion of pregnancy-related AESIs and SAEs in pregnant participants from the first dose until the end of study follow-up, compared with placebo, and (ii) the geometric mean concentration (GMC) of anti-HEV IgG at four weeks after the second dose, comparing pregnant vaccine recipients with non-pregnant vaccine recipients (non-inferiority margin of 0.67 for the GMC ratio). Immunogenicity will be evaluated in a pre-specified subset of 300 participants receiving Hecolin, including 150 pregnant participants and 150 non-pregnant participants. Secondary outcomes will include maternal, neonatal, and infant safety outcomes, as well as immunogenicity according to the number of Hecolin doses received and the trimester of vaccination. Ethics and Dissemination The trial was approved by the National Bioethics Committee (NBC) of Pakistan (Reference number: 4-87/NBC-910), the institutional Ethics Review Committee (ERC) of the Aga Khan University (Reference number: 8298), and the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the International Vaccine Institute (IVI) (Reference number: 2022-007). All participants will provide written informed consent in accordance with Good Clinical Practice. The results will be submitted to World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts in Immunization (SAGE), and disseminated through conference presentations, and peer-reviewed publications.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and Safety of a 14-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide conjugate vaccine (PNEUBEVAX 14TM) administered to 6-8 weeks old healthy Indian Infants: A single blind, randomized, active-controlled, Phase-III study 96%
- A randomized, double-blind phase I clinical trial of two recombinant dimeric RBD COVID-19 vaccine candidates: safety, reactogenicity and immunogenicity 96%
- Safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of Biological E’s CORBEVAX™ vaccine in children and adolescents: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo controlled, Phase-2/3 Study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and effectiveness of dose-sparing strategies for seasonal influenza vaccine: a rapid scoping review of fractional dosing of the intramuscular influenza vaccine 94%
- COVID-19 vaccines and evidence-based medicine 94%
- Reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following mRNA COVID-19 vaccines: A systematic review of spontaneously reported data from the UK, Europe, and the US and of the literature 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immunogenicity and safety of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine compared with Trivalent Influenza HA vaccine and evaluation of Quadrivalent Influenza HA vaccine batch-to-batch consistency in Indonesian children and adults 96%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 COVID-19 vaccine in adults: data from a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-dose, phase 3 trial in Russia 95%
- Immune response induced by the Recombinant Novel Coronavirus Vaccine (Adenovirus Type 5 Vector) (Ad5-nCoV) in persons living with HIV (PLWH) 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety and immunogenicity of the BBIBP-CorV vaccine in adolescents aged 12-17 years in Thai population, prospective cohort study 96%
- Long-Term Immunogenicity Study of an Aluminum Phosphate-Adjuvanted Inactivated Enterovirus A71 Vaccine in Children: An Extension to a Phase 2 Study 95%
- Immunogenicity and adverse events of priming with inactivated whole SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (CoronaVac) followed by boosting the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Safety of MVA-BN in Healthcare Personnel, Democratic Republic of the Congo 96%
- Immunogenicity and Safety Following a Homologous Booster Dose of a SARS-CoV-2 recombinant spike protein vaccine (NVX-CoV2373): A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial 95%
- Immunogenicity and safety of a third dose, and immune persistence of CoronaVac vaccine in healthy adults aged 18-59 years: interim results from a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.