Back

Experiences of frontline physiotherapists during the COVID-19 pandemic at two tertiary hospitals in Southern Malawi: A phenomenological qualitative study

Phiri, A.; Chinula, E.; Jangwa, C.; Khosa, E.; Tarimo, N.; Bickton, F. M.

2026-08-10 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.64898/2026.08.07.26359182 medRxiv
Show abstract

Frontline healthcare workers (HCWs) during the COVID-19 pandemic in Malawi included physiotherapists. This study explored the experiences of those physiotherapists to help prepare workforce support plans in the future in the advent of a new disease outbreak. This phenomenological qualitative study was conducted between 2 May and 15 June 2024 at two tertiary hospitals in Southern Malawi namely, Queen Elizabeth Central Hospital (QECH) and Zomba Central Hospital (ZCH). Participants were purposely sampled and included physiotherapists who had been involved in caring for patients with COVID-19 at the two hospitals. Data was collected from 11 participants (9 from QECH and 3 from ZCH) using physical in-depth interviews. The recorded interviews were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analyzed using a deductive thematic approach. Themes were broadly categorized into positive and negative experiences. Among positive experiences, participants reported that physiotherapy interventions facilitated quick recovery of patients. In some instances where oxygen cylinders were not enough or had run out of oxygen, physiotherapy interventions were lifesaving. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic raised awareness of physiotherapy's role in COVID-19 management and resulted in permanent employment for several physiotherapists. Under the theme of negative experiences, participants faced challenges with team recognition, communication, staff shortages, inadequate equipment, and no local physiotherapy guidelines. The findings suggest Malawis healthcare system needs better pandemic preparedness and stronger interdisciplinary care.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.