Genomic repeats for single-cell molecular recording
Dveirin, R. K.; Lin, J. D.; Vyas, P.; Lu, J.; Yan, Y.; Lee, J. J.; Dong, X.; Kannan, S.; Langmead, B.; Reddy, S. K.; LIN, D.; Kalhor, R.
Show abstract
Genomic recording enables transient biological signals to be indelibly captured through DNA alterations, creating a permanent record of cellular history retrievable by sequencing. However, current methods are limited by scarce writing space, typically targeting only one or a few amenable genomic sites and requiring large cell populations for signal reconstruction. Here, we establish Repeats for Genomic Recording (RGRs): sequences with up to 400 copies targetable by a single CRISPR guide RNA, readable with a common primer pair, and predicted to have minimal functional impact. We demonstrate that RGRs enable both signal deconvolution in single cells and high-resolution recording in cell populations. Individual RGR sites exhibit distinct response kinetics; thus, combining them improves recording resolution beyond what redundancy alone provides, analogous to diversity reception in wireless communication. We develop a computational pipeline for systematic RGR identification, revealing 15,000 to 25,000 candidates per species across human, mouse, and zebrafish, thereby markedly expanding recording capacity and enabling cell-type-specific applications. Finally, we validate RGRs in live mice by recording long-term immediate early gene activity across the brain following epilepsy induction. This work establishes genomic repeats as a high-capacity platform for single-cell molecular recording in vivo.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multifunctional fibers enable modulation of cortical and deep brain activity during cognitive behavior in macaques 95%
- Functional interrogation of neuronal connections by chemoptogenetic presynaptic ablation 94%
- Two-photon photoactivated voltage imaging in tissue with an Archaerhodopsin-derived reporter 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.