Interpersonal Synchronization of Brain and Body Tracks Attention and Listening Engagement
Lambrechts, L.; Accou, B.; Vanthornhout, J.; Boets, B.; Francart, T.
Show abstract
PurposeSpeech perception is a fundamental part of everyday communication that relies on more than simple identification of words and sentences. Attention and listening engagement both contribute to speech perception, while representing distinct aspects of the listening experience. Attention is typically associated with cognitive focus, whereas listening engagement additionally involves cognitive and affective immersion in sound. Despite their importance, these states remain difficult to disentangle, behaviorally and physiologically. Both have been linked to interpersonal synchronization (the synchronization of biobehavioral signals across individuals), raising questions about what this synchronization actually reflects. MethodIn this study, we disentangled attention and listening engagement by independently manipulating both factors within a single experiment. Thirty participants listened to two simultaneously presented streams of meaningful speech and were instructed to focus on only one. Both attended and unattended stimuli were designed to be either engaging or non-engaging. Neural activity was recorded using EEG, while physiological responses were measured using heart rate and electrodermal activity. ResultsInterpersonal synchronization was computed from neural and bodily signals, alongside a self- report measure of listening engagement and auditory attention decoding (AAD), a neural measure of selective attention. Interpersonal synchronization of all three modalities significantly predicted listening engagement, whereas neural interpersonal synchronization was the only measure that significantly predicted attention. These findings suggest that attention is primarily driven by cognitive processes represented in the brain, while listening engagement additionally involves affective processes that are more strongly reflected in bodily responses. ConclusionsOverall, this study demonstrates that different forms of interpersonal synchronization reflect distinct dimensions of the listening experience and supports interpersonal synchronization as a potential objective marker of listening engagement.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Rapid Brain Responses to Familiar vs. Unfamiliar Music - an EEG and Pupillometry study 95%
- Predicting the subjective intensity of imagined sensory experiences from electrophysiological measures of oscillatory brain activity. 94%
- The Relation between Alpha/Beta Oscillations and the Encoding of Sentence induced Contextual Information 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Top-down modulation of neural envelope tracking: the interplay with behavioral, self-reported and neural measures of listening effort 95%
- More than Words: Neurophysiological Correlates of Semantic Dissimilarity Depend on Comprehension of the Speech Narrative 94%
- Time course of EEG complexity reflects attentionalengagement during listening to speech in noise 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.