Back

Human buccal epithelial microplicae maintain a characteristic wavelength despite variable network topology

McConnell, G.

2026-08-07 cell biology
10.64898/2026.08.06.743190 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Microplicae are ridge-like membrane projections that are prominent features of many epithelial surfaces, yet little is known about the principles governing their spatial organisation. Determining whether microplicae represent stochastic membrane folds or biologically organised surface architectures is essential for understanding their formation and functional roles. Here, differential interference contrast images of human buccal epithelial cells were analysed using quantitative image-processing approaches. Ridge networks were segmented and characterised using complementary measurements of characteristic wavelength, including medial-axis and nearest-neighbour Voronoi analyses, together with skeleton-based metrics describing network architecture. Analysis of n=100 buccal epithelial cells sampled from n=10 donors revealed a reproducible sub-micron characteristic wavelength. Mean medial-axis spacing was 0.511 {+/-} 0.042 {micro}m and mean Voronoi nearest-neighbour spacing was 0.588 {+/-} 0.057 {micro}m. Characteristic wavelength exhibited CV of between only 8.26% and 9.67% across the dataset. However, metrics describing network architecture, including ridge density, branching and connectivity, varied by up to 109%. Donor-level analysis reported the same overall trends, with conservation of the characteristic wavelength while network parameters had considerably greater variation. These findings identify a previously unrecognised organising principle of microplical architecture, suggesting that epithelial membrane organisation is regulated through conservation of an intrinsic geometric length scale while network topology remains comparatively free to remodel.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.