BactoMate: an integrated platform for reproducible bacterial microscopy analysis
Hallenga, L.; Fornoff, S.; Pesch, M.; Kohlheyer, D.; Ahmad, S.; Hoer, J.; Erhardt, M.; Popp, P. F.
Show abstract
Quantitative microscopy of microorganisms increasingly produces large, multidimensional datasets, yet their analysis often depends on fragmented workflows spanning file conversion, segmentation, quality control, fluorescence quantification, tracking, and visualization. Here, we present BactoMate, an open-source, cross-platform graphical user interface that integrates these steps into a unified workflow for microbial image analysis. BactoMate incorporates established segmentation methods and supports both single-file and batch processing. Its modules enable image preprocessing, cell segmentation, morphology-based quality control, fluorescence and foci quantification, single-cell tracking, lineage reconstruction, structured data export, and generation of quality-control and visualization outputs. We demonstrate the applicability of BactoMate across multichannel fluorescence imaging, bacterial swimming assays, microcolony lineage analysis, phage infection assay and a microfluidic time series. All user-configurable parameters are exposed through the interface, are recorded alongside structured outputs and can be loaded for reproducible image analyses across experiments to reduce introduction of bias. By reducing workflow handoffs while preserving parameter control and exportable results, BactoMate enables accessible, reproducible, and scalable quantitative analysis of microbial microscopy data.
Matching journals
The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Sardine: a modular framework for developing data acquisition and near real-time analysis applications 96%
- ColiCoords: A Python package for the analysis of bacterial fluorescence microscopy data 94%
- microbeSEG: A deep learning software tool with OMERO data management for efficient and accurate cell segmentation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.