A framework for quality assurance in human intracranial electrophysiology
Herz, N.; Cao, R.; Qiu, S.
Show abstract
Intracranial electroencephalography (iEEG) provides an unprecedented opportunity to directly record neural activity and causally perturb the human brain through electrical stimulation. Yet, the increasingly collaborative nature and complexity of modern iEEG studies pose substantial challenges for experimental control, data quality, and standardization. Unlike most experimental modalities, human iEEG data are acquired within dynamic clinical environments, where patient condition, recording quality, hardware configuration, and experimental protocols may vary across recording sessions and collaborating sites. The resulting heterogeneity creates opportunities for technical and procedural failures that often remain undetected until downstream analyses, when corrective action is no longer possible. Here, we present a framework for standardized session-level quality assurance in human iEEG research and provide an open-source implementation compatible with Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS)-organized datasets. The framework defines four complementary domains of quality assessment crucial for human iEEG studies: protocol fidelity, behavioral integrity, stimulation validation, and signal quality. These domains integrate electrophysiological recordings, behavioral event logs, and stimulation metadata to verify data completeness, confirm participant engagement, validate stimulation delivery, and identify potentially compromised recording channels. Automated quality metrics and standardized diagnostic visualizations are generated following each testing session, enabling rapid identification of technical and procedural failures while corrective action is still possible. By providing a standardized approach to session-level quality assurance, the framework improves data integrity, enhances reproducibility, facilitates analyst training, and supports harmonized data collection across laboratories and clinical sites.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- EPI distortion correction for simultaneous human brain stimulation and imaging at 3T 93%
- BrainTRACE (Brain Tumor Registration and Cortical Electrocorticography): A Novel Tool for Localizing Electrocorticography Electrodes in Patients with Brain Tumors 93%
- A biophysically constrained brain connectivity model based on stimulation-evoked potentials. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- RAVE: comprehensive open-source software for reproducible analysis and visualization of intracranial EEG data 94%
- Correction of respiratory artifacts in MRI head motion estimates 94%
- Quantifying Cerebellar Signal Detectability in MEG and EEG in Epilepsy Using Anatomically Informed Source Modeling 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Robust functional ultrasound imaging in the awake and behaving brain: a systematic framework for motion artifact removal 94%
- BrainQCNet: a Deep Learning attention-based model for the automated detection of artifacts in brain structural MRI scans. 93%
- Automated quality control of T1-weighted brain MRI scans for clinical research: methods comparison and design of a quality prediction classifier 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
- Effective correction of extreme capacitive artifacts in TMS-EEG via windowed detrending 93%
- PyHFO: Lightweight Deep Learning-poweredEnd-to-End High-Frequency Oscillations AnalysisApplication 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.