Back

Stability of c-Myc protein differentiates Ras oncogene addiction and MAPK pathway dependency in Ras-mutant multiple myeloma

Luo, J.; Lee, Y.-H.; Cataisson, C.; Zhang, H.; Gaikwad, S.; du Bois, W. D.; Michalowski, A. M.; Yang, H. H.; Meyer, T. J.; Young, R. M.; Mock, B. A.

2026-08-07 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.06.743109 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell malignancy that frequently harbors activating mutations in NRAS and KRAS oncogenes. Previous clinical trials targeting the Ras/MAPK oncogenic pathway with MEK inhibitors (MEKi) were met with limited efficacy, and newer generation of Ras inhibitors (RASi) have not been specifically evaluated in MM patients. To investigate the vulnerabilities of Ras-mutant MM to targeted therapies, we examined the sensitivity of a panel of human MM cell lines to the RASi RMC-6236 (daraxonrasib) and the MEKi trametinib. Although Ras-mutant MM cells are responsive to oncogenic Ras signaling and are sensitive to RAS inhibition, their sensitivity to MEK inhibition is heterogeneous. Mechanistic studies revealed that c-Myc protein is destabilized by MEK inhibition only in MEKi-sensitive MM cells but not in MEKi-resistant cells, and pharmacological and genetic stabilization of c-Myc is sufficient to confer MEKi resistance. In contrast, Ras inhibition reduced c-Myc protein across all MM cell lines tested, regardless of their dependency on the MAPK pathway, and c-Myc expression was insufficient to promote RASi resistance. Together, these findings demonstrate that c-Myc protein stability differentiates the response of Ras-mutant MM cells to Ras and MEK inhibition, and suggest that direct targeting of the Ras oncoprotein, rather than its downstream MAPK pathway, may present a more effective strategy.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.