Back

Thermal conditions and habitat size explain elevational range shift of the northern pika

Sakiyama, T.; Garcia Molinos, J.

2026-08-10 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.06.743106 bioRxiv
Show abstract

AimSpecies in mountain ecosystems often experience upslope distribution shifts in response to climate change. However, elevational range dynamics exhibit substantial complexity around this general trend, with varying magnitude and direction of shifts observed among studies. We tested whether factors other than temperature, such as habitat size and land use, are also responsible for observed elevational shifts in a cold adapted species. LocationHokkaido, Japan MethodsWe resurveyed 61 historical (1963-2007) occurrence sites covering a wide elevational range (60-2,210 m) within the distribution range of the northern pika (Ochotona hyperborea). We assessed the existence of elevational shifts using quantile regression and the relative importance of temperature, habitat size, and land use on the shift using occupancy analysis. ResultsWe detected presence of the northern pika at 41 sites, suggesting extirpations at 20 sites (32.8%) across a wide elevational range of 60-1,550 m. The concentration of extirpation sites at low to mid elevations resulted in a significant upslope shift of the distribution centroid, although the shift was nonsignificant at lower and upper portions of the range. The occupancy analysis revealed a negative effect of long-term mean of summer maximum temperature and a stronger positive effect of habitat size. ConclusionsThis highlights the susceptibility of the northern pika to heat stress and the importance of larger habitats and thus habitat heterogeneity for persistence of local populations. Given the possibility that the observed shift represents a precursor of elevational contraction, continuous monitoring of the local populations is highly needed to evaluate their long-term viability.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.