Back

A Stickiness Response System in Rats

Tan, S.; Rencken, S.; Childs, T.; Stone, J.; Tiesman, A.; Anderson, P.; Brecht, M.; Clemens, A. M.

2026-08-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.06.742745 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The perception of stickiness is known to everyone who interacts with the world. While eating, walking, and navigating diverse environments including crowded subways, forests, fields and lunchrooms, stickiness is a common and old sensation. Responses to sticky stimuli have been measured in animal and human brains; however, precise behavioral responses and the underlying neural mechanisms are not well understood. We applied sticky stimuli to three-week-old rat pups and found the effects vary greatly across the animals body: Sticky stimuli are quickly removed from forepaws and nose, but often evoke only little reaction from hindpaws. When we applied sticky (marshmallow, mochi) and non-sticky stimuli (water, oil) to forepaws, we observed stimulus unspecific behaviors (licking and grooming) with variable response onsets as well as three fast-onset sticky-specific behaviors. Sticky-specific behaviors were exclusively triggered by sticky stimuli and included paw shaking and paw swiping (behaviors presumably aiming at stickiness removal) and paw tapping. In tapping, animals gently tap their forepaws onto each other or on the ground; we wondered if the resulting paw-substrate detachments serve stickiness sensing. Blocking of forepaw skin sensation reduced sticky-specific responses to sticky stimuli compared to control conditions (Ringers injections). To assess central representations of stickiness, we obtained in vivo whole-cell recordings of neurons in forepaw-somatosensory-cortex while presenting sticky and non-sticky stimuli to anesthetized rat pups. While responses were heterogeneous across the population, we observed individual neurons that had significantly different responses to stimulus detachment for sticky and non-sticky stimuli. In summary, we describe a fast-onset, body-part-specific stickiness response system in rats, which is strongly driven by forepaw skin afferents. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=142 SRC="FIGDIR/small/742745v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (38K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2ad341org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1936c2forg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@1a39d23org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@a196e9_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.