Back

Combination spinal cord stimulation at different frequencies produces sustained pain relief with immune activation

Huh, Y.; Song, S.; Chen, T.; Zhang, T.; Hershey, B.; Esteller, R.; Ji, R.-R.

2026-08-12 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.06.742589 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an established therapy for neuropathic pain, typically delivered at either low (60 Hz) or high (1 kHz) frequencies, with analgesic effects largely dependent on active stimulation. Here, we investigated whether combined-frequency SCS produces sustained analgesia beyond stimulation periods and explored the underlying mechanisms. Using a spared nerve injury (SNI) model in both rats and mice, we applied dual-frequency SCS (60 Hz + 1 kHz). This paradigm produced robust reversal of mechanical allodynia during stimulation and, notably, a progressive and long-lasting analgesic effect that persisted for days to weeks after stimulation cessation. RNA sequencing revealed pronounced immune-related transcriptional changes in the spinal cord, including upregulation of innate immune, pro-resolution, and neutrophil-associated pathways. Functional studies demonstrated that neutrophil depletion attenuated SCS-induced analgesia, whereas intrathecal S100A8 treatment mimicked therapeutic effects via CD69/SOCS3 signaling. These findings identify dual-frequency SCS as a promising strategy to prolong analgesia and highlight a critical role for neuroimmune modulation in sustained pain relief. HighlightsO_LICombined-frequency, not single-frequency SCS, sustains analgesia during washout C_LIO_LICombination SCS induces robust immune activation in spinal cord and DRG C_LIO_LICombination SCS increases spinal perfusion and promotes neutrophil recruitment C_LIO_LINeutrophil signaling contributes to sustained SCS analgesia C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.