Back

Single-shot simultaneous BOLD and velocity-encoding MRI for functional and slow-flow imaging

Widmaier, M. S.; Chao, T.-H.; Emir, U.; Chang, W.-T.

2026-08-11 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.05.743034 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) motion is coupled with global blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) fluctuations, but the spatial relationship between regional brain activity and CSF dynamics remains poorly understood. Here, we developed a single-shot BOLD-VENC sequence that combines gradient-echo BOLD imaging with spin-echo velocity encoding following the same RF excitation, enabling simultaneous measurement of brain-wide BOLD activity and spatially resolved slow CSF velocity at 3T. The velocity measurement was validated in a slow-flow phantom and in five healthy participants using paced-breathing, breath-holding, and visual-stimulation experiments. Phantom measurements showed strong agreement with prescribed velocities over 0.1-1.0 mm/s (R2 = 0.93-0.98). In vivo measurements demonstrated respiratory- and cardiac-dependent changes in CSF velocity magnitude and direction across the ventricles and cortical subarachnoid spaces (SAS). The established coupling between the negative derivative of the global BOLD signal and fourth-ventricle CSF inflow was reproduced, with a peak lag of 0.9 s. Global BOLD fluctuations were also coupled with spatially distributed CSF velocity changes across ventricular and cortical CSF spaces, with a similar peak lag of 1.2 s. During visual checkerboard stimulation, BOLD-CSF velocity coupling was localized primarily to the SAS surrounding the activated visual cortex, demonstrating a regional relationship between local BOLD activity and nearby CSF motion. These findings establish the feasibility of simultaneous BOLD and slow CSF velocity imaging and extend BOLD-CSF coupling from a global measure toward spatially resolved assessment of hemodynamic-CSF interactions.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.