SeqDesk: a sequencing-facility management system for standards-compliant and FAIR (meta)data submission
Muench, P. C.; Robertson, G.; McHardy, A. C.
Show abstract
Achieving FAIR compliance requires both standardized metadata and infrastructure for data deposition, yet in practice a large fraction of sequencing studies is still published without the persistent, standards-compliant metadata that reuse depends on. Collecting MIxS-compliant metadata is complex: environment-specific checklists can contain hundreds of fields, and the effort is magnified when metadata is assembled retrospectively at publication time rather than captured throughout the project. We developed SeqDesk, an open-source data management system for sequencing facilities that is designed so that FAIR-compliant public data is produced as the natural output of routine operations. Its current scope is microbial sequencing data, covering metagenomes as well as isolate genomes, for which it supports the corresponding MIxS checklists. SeqDesk gives a sequencing facility a configurable order-and-tracking system for sequencing projects, captures and validates MIxS-compliant metadata aligned with ENA checklists at project initiation, runs bioinformatics analyses through Nextflow pipelines, and brokers submission to the European Nucleotide Archive, all within the institutions own infrastructure. By embedding standards-compliant metadata capture into the sequencing-facility workflow rather than bolting it on at submission, SeqDesk shortens the path from sample to reusable public data. The underlying checklist model is generic, so support can be extended to further data types and metadata standards beyond the microbial domain. SeqDesk is free and open source under the Apache 2.0 licence and available at https://seqdesk.org, with a live demonstration at https://seqdesk.org/#demo.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.