Back

MEGA-ODE: Learning Biologically Structured and Navigable Continuous Perturbation Dynamics from Sparse Omics

Xiang, Y.; Li, Y.; Tian, C.; Gu, R.; He, F.; Wen, H.; Xie, L.; Zhou, P.

2026-08-05 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.05.742921 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Perturbation-omics experiments usually measure only a subset of molecular feature, intervention and time space, leaving many response trajectories, perturbation effects and disease- or differentiation-associated transitions unobserved. Here we present MEGA-ODE, a graph-constrained continuous-time framework for reconstructing sparse dynamic omics landscapes, predicting unmeasured molecular states and prioritizing virtual perturbations toward defined biological endpoints. MEGA-ODE integrates molecular-network priors, graph neural ordinary differential equations and context-adaptive mixture-of-experts routing. In L1000 transcriptomic perturbations and CPPA proteomic drug-response data, MEGA-ODE improved held-out-feature and unseen-perturbation prediction over baseline methods, and in SARS-CoV-2 infection time-series data it remained competitive for future-time-point forecasting. In a COVID-19 patient cohort, predicted intermediate profiles improved retrospective disease-stage stratification relative to observed profiles alone, while expert programs highlighted immune and inflammatory signals associated with severity. Across the MAPK drug-response and stem-cell differentiation case studies, graph- and expert-level attributions prioritized perturbation-associated MAPK edges, developmental regulators and TF-target relationships supported by independent promoter-proximal ChIP-seq overlap. In hESC-to-definitive-endoderm differentiation, MEGA-ODE prioritized candidate transcription-factor perturbations predicted to shift 12-36 h profiles toward 96 h definitive-endoderm marker signatures, framing trajectory navigation as a concrete hypothesis-generation task. Together, these results support biologically structured continuous-time modeling for prediction, interpretation and virtual-perturbation prioritization from sparse temporal omics data.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.