Back

Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing in primary human hematopoietic cells to advance studies into HIV biology

Chen, H.-R.; Kadzioch, N. P.; Gapp, M.; Yang, H.-H.; Ruhle, A.; Villamizar Cujar, J.; Fuchs, T.; Schmacke, N. A.; Hornung, V.; Speck, R. F.; Keppler, O. T.; Albanese, M.

2026-08-05 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.05.741689 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Defining how human host factors shape HIV-1 infection in vivo remains essential for the development of genetically engineered cell therapies. Here, we established a non-viral CRISPR/Cas9 ribonucleoprotein-based platform for efficient single and multiplex gene editing in primary human CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Edited HSPCs retained viability, proliferative capacity, primitive immunophenotypes, and multilineage differentiation potential and supported targeted reporter knock-in independently of the cell source, cord blood (CB), bone marrow (BM), and mobilized from peripheral blood (MPB). Following differentiation, SAMHD1 knockout increased HIV-1 susceptibility of HSPC-derived macrophages, MX2 knockout also increased HIV infection in cells pre-stimulated with IFN-2a, and CXCR4 knockout blocked X4-tropic HIV-1 infection of HSPC-derived megakaryocytes. We then transplanted CCR5-, SAMHD1-, or non-targeting control-edited HSPCs into immunodeficient mice and challenged reconstituted animals with R5-tropic HIV-1. CCR5 knockout prevented detectable viral spread, validating the model using a clinically relevant dependency factor. In contrast, SAMHD1 knockout accelerated viral dissemination, with earlier plasma viremia and 3.6-fold higher cumulative viremia, although endpoint viral burden was not significantly different from controls. These findings establish transplantation of CRISPR/Cas9-edited human HSPCs as a modular platform for dissecting HIV-1 host-factor function across hematopoietic lineages ex vivo and in vivo and for evaluating engineered cell-based strategies.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.