Diagnostic Accuracy Of Visual Inspection With Acetic Acid For Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Living With Human Immunodeficiency Virus In Osogbo, Nigeria

Background Women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (WLHIV) are at high risk of cervical cancer. While Human Papilloma Virus Deoxyribonucleic acid (HPV DNA) testing is the standard of care, its cost limits widespread use in resource-limited settings, therefore visual inspection with acetic acid (VIA) remains the primary screening method. This study therefore evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of VIA compared to HPV DNA testing for cervical cancer screening among WLHIV in Nigeria. Methods This cross-sectional analytical study was conducted between November 2022 and November 2024 in Osogbo, Nigeria among 300 WLHIV on antiretroviral therapy aged 25-49 years underwent cervical cancer screening using VIA and HPV DNA testing (Ampfire HPV test kits, ATILA Biosystems(R) USA). All 309 participants underwent colposcopy and biopsy regardless of their screening results, with histological examination serving as the gold standard. Data were analyzed using Stata, with diagnostic performance measures calculated using histology as the gold standard. Results The mean age of participants was 42.6 {+/-} 6.4 years. Thirty-six of 309 women (11.7%) were VIA-positive, while 91 (29.4%) were HPV-positive. Histology confirmed CIN2+ in 22 participants (7.1%). HPV testing demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity than VIA for detecting CIN2+ (91.2%, 95% CI: 76.3-98.1 vs. 44.1%, 95% CI: 26.7-62.6; p<0.001) and higher negative predictive value (98.9%, 95% CI: 96.3-99.8 vs. 92.0%, 95% CI: 88.0-95.0; p<0.001). However, VIA showed higher specificity (91.7%, 95% CI: 87.8-94.7 vs. 83.3%, 95% CI: 78.4-87.6; p=0.003). The agreement between the two tests was fair (kappa = 0.20, p<0.001). Both HPV positivity (adjusted OR: 42.1, 95% CI: 9.5-186.2; p<0.001) and VIA positivity (adjusted OR: 6.9, 95% CI: 2.6-18.4; p<0.001) were independently associated with CIN2+. Conclusion HPV DNA testing demonstrated superior sensitivity and negative predictive value compared to VIA for detecting CIN2+ among WLHIV, while VIA showed higher specificity. Keywords: Cervical cancer screening, visual inspection with acetic acid, Human Papilloma Virus Women living with HIV, Nigeria