Variation in uptake and dose reduction of CDK4/6 inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer in England, 2019-2024: a descriptive observational study using OpenPrescribing Hospitals
Fisher, L.; Polwart, C.; Wood, C.; Goldacre, B.; Anderson, L.; Isherwood, J.; Hindocha, S.; MacKenna, B.; Speed, V.
Show abstract
Background The number of novel cancer therapies approved for use in England by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence is increasing. Monitoring the adoption of new therapies is important to assess equity of access and evaluate real-world prescribing practices. OpenPrescribing Hospitals has recently been launched to facilitate analysis of open secondary care medicines data in England. Using this platform, we set out to describe the use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including the frequency of dose reductions, within National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England between January 2019 and December 2024. Methods The monthly proportion of each CDK4/6 inhibitor relative to total CDK4/6 inhibitor use was calculated at hospital level. Regional variation was assessed across Cancer Alliances by comparing the proportions of each CDK4/6 inhibitor used within each alliance in 2021 and 2024. Use of lower strength palbociclib and abemaciclib was used as a proxy for dose reductions. Findings There was more than a 3-fold increase in the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors between 2019 and 2024. In 2019, 78.6%, 11.9% and 9.5% of CDK4/6 inhibitors used were palbociclib, abemaciclib and ribociclib, compared with 40.2%, 41.2% and 18.6% in 2024. There was variation in the relative percentage change in use of each agent by Cancer Alliance. Use of lower strengths was common for both palbociclib (60%) and abemaciclib (63%). Interpretation Changes in usage appeared responsive to publication of key evidence and regulatory milestones. There was a higher apparent frequency of dose reductions than reported in clinical trials. OpenPrescribing Hospitals is an accessible, publicly available tool for understanding uptake and use of medicines in NHS hospitals in England.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and validation of multivariable machine learning algorithms to predict risk of cancer in symptomatic patients referred urgently from primary care 90%
- How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England. 90%
- Evaluation of the General Practice Pharmacist (GPP) intervention to optimise prescribing in Irish primary care: a non-randomised pilot study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Inequalities in the decline and recovery of pathological cancer diagnoses during the first six months of the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-based study 89%
- Patient attrition in Molecular Tumour Boards: A Review 89%
- BRCA-DIRECT digital pathway for diagnostic germline genetic testing within a UK breast oncology setting: a randomised, non-inferiority trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Educational interventions delivered to prescribing advisers to influence primary care prescribing: a very low-cost pragmatic randomised trial using routine data from OpenPrescribing.net 91%
- Access to personal protective equipment in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom: results from a nationwide cohort study (UK-REACH) 88%
- Spatio-temporal modelling of referrals to outpatient respiratory clinics in the integrated care system of the Morecambe Bay area, England 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 92%
- Variation in prescription duration for long term conditions: a cohort study in English NHS primary care using OpenPrescribing 92%
- OpenSAFELY NHS Service Restoration Observatory 1: describing trends and variation in primary care clinical activity for 23.3 million patients in England during the first wave of COVID-19 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Non-medical prescribing policy in the United Kingdom National Health Service: systematic review and narrative synthesis 91%
- Changes in dispensing of medicines proposed for re-purposing in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia 90%
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.