Sequence adaptations satisfy the constraints of mitochondrial membrane protein evolution
Yadav, T.; Borowsky, J.; Narbona-Perez, A. J.; Soni, B.; Cunningham, C. N.; Carrington, J.; Grabe, M.; Rutter, J.
Show abstract
Inner mitochondrial membrane proteins must be sufficiently hydrophilic to withstand aqueous exposure during translation and transit to the mitochondria. Meanwhile, their transmembrane segments must be sufficiently hydrophobic to stably embed in the lipid membrane. We hypothesized that sequence-level adaptations evolved to balance these constraints. Here, we integrate structure-informed evolutionary analyses of mitochondrial proteins with atomistic simulations and cell-based experiments to identify aliphatic-to-threonine substitutions (ATS) as a potential solution to these constraints. With high statistical confidence, this transmembrane segment-specific adaptation is recurrently and convergently observed throughout mitochondrial evolution. Conformational analyses show that threonine interacts with both water and the transmembrane helix backbone, thereby lowering hydrophobicity without destabilizing secondary structure. In the extremely hydrophobic ATP6 protein, reverting threonines to aliphatic residues disrupts mitochondrial targeting, while introducing threonines into a poorly targeted variant improves its mitochondrial localization. These findings have implications for mitochondrial genome evolution, the rational design of membrane proteins, and potentially mitochondrial gene therapy.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Evolutionary repurposing of a DNA segregation machinery into a cytoskeletal system controlling cyanobacterial cell shape 95%
- Multi-scale structure of chromatin condensates rationalizes phase separation and material properties 94%
- Genomic architecture and introgression shape a butterfly radiation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.