Back

Allelic Diversity and Core Conservation of Type III Effectors Across Xanthomonads Causing Bacterial Spot of Pepper and Tomato

Parajuli, A.; Subedi, A.; Kaur, A.; McDuffee, S.; Iruegas Bocardo, F.; Klein-Gordon, J.; Sharma, A.; Vallad, G.; Goss, E.; Jones, J. B.

2026-08-09 genomics
10.64898/2026.08.04.742720 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Bacterial spot of tomato and pepper (BST/P) is an economically devastating disease caused by four distinct Xanthomonas pathogens: X. euvesicatoria pv. euvesicatoria (Xe), X. euvesicatoria pv. perforans (Xp), X. hortorum pv. gardneri (Xg), and X. vesicatoria (Xv). A key component of virulence in these pathogens is the type III secretion system (T3SS), which delivers type III effector (T3E) proteins into host plant cells. To comprehensively characterize T3E repertoires and assess the stability of core effectors at a population scale, we evaluated a global dataset comprising 1,037 quality-filtered genomes, including 585 Xp, 350 Xe, 69 Xg, and 33 Xv strains. Across this collection, genes for six effectors were present in 100% of the examined genomes (XopK, XopL, XopM, XopN, XopX, and XopZ1) and an additional four effectors in [≥]95% of genomes (XopK, XopL, XopM, XopN, XopX, and XopZ1). Xp and Xe populations maintained large total effector repertoires with extensive allelic variation, displaying exceptional polymorphism within XopD and XopAD. In contrast, Xg and Xv exhibited highly stable effector profiles with markedly reduced allelic diversification across geographic regions and decades. Disruptive mutations, including early stop codons and frameshifts mutations, in genes for XopAZ, XopAF, and XopAR were prevalent across specific pathogens pointing to ongoing pseudogenization and targeted gene loss. These findings provide a high-resolution characterization of the conserved and variable components of the BST/P pathogen effector arsenal and serve as a foundation for monitoring population evolution and breeding durable disease resistance to multiple pathogens.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.