Back

Heart rate dynamics embed a shared representation of individual brain organization and cognitive function

Qian, L.; Fulcher, B. D.; Ju, S.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, Y.; Xia, Y.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, L.; Zou, Y.; Schumann, G.; Zou, X.; Song, K.; Mao, Y.

2026-08-10 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.04.742623 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Idiosyncratic brain functional organization shapes intricate cardiac dynamics through central-peripheral autonomic interactions, yet a comprehensive mapping between multi-scale heart rate dynamics and whole-brain functional architecture remains lacking. Here, combining highly comparative time-series analysis with multi-modal neuroimaging and intracranial electrophysiology, we establish heart rate dynamics as a physiological fingerprint that maps onto whole-brain functional architecture. Partial least squares analysis revealed a generalizable latent axis linking reduced heart rate temporal complexity and elevated micro-scale predictability to heightened resting-state functional connectivity across default mode, salience, and sensorimotor networks. This covariance aligns spatially with serotonergic, noradrenergic, and cholinergic neuromodulatory gradients, persists across physiological confound controls and cross-session validations, derives support from human intracranial electrophysiological recordings, and extends to active cognitive states. Furthermore, brain-covarying heart rate signatures underpin the predictive capacity of heart rate dynamics for individual fluid and crystallized intelligence, demonstrating a shared representational substrate. Our findings demonstrate a robust neurovisceral coupling architecture, establishing well-characterized heart rate dynamics as a scalable, neurobiologically anchored window into human brain functional organization and cognitive traits.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.