A Framework for Benchmarking Pathway Reconstruction Algorithms
Talluri, N.; Figueroa-Reid, T.; Hiemstra, J.; Magnano, C. S.; Shedivy, A.; Panda, N.; Liu, Y.; Sanjeev, S.; Anderson, O. F.; Barelvi, A.; O'Brien, A.; Johnson, O. T.; Haddad, J. A.; Halberg-Spencer, S. A.; Nurbol, A.; Jan, I.; Degbelo, M.; Nachreiner, D.; Llera-Magord, C.; Howland, G.; Li, G. H.; Ritz, A.; Gitter, A.
Show abstract
Cells coordinate diverse biological processes through interactions among thousands of molecules, but mapping these interactions comprehensively and systematically remains an open problem. Pathway reconstruction algorithms address this problem by linking molecules of interest, identified from high-throughput omics experiments, using prior knowledge encoded as background interaction networks. This process recovers intermediate molecules and interactions that were not directly measured in the experimental data but plausibly connect the observed molecules. It generates testable hypotheses about interactions that drive cell behavior and informs the choice of follow-up experiments. Many algorithms have been created over decades, each optimizing different computational objectives and relying on different assumptions. The resulting heterogeneity has made benchmarking challenging, limiting systematic comparisons. Therefore, selecting an algorithm for a given biological context remains a non-trivial and poorly informed task. This registered report presents a large-scale benchmark of pathway reconstruction algorithms, evaluating 14 algorithms across 822 datasets from four biological settings. To enable this benchmark, we introduce Signaling Pathway Reconstruction Analysis Streamliner (SPRAS), which standardizes algorithm inputs, outputs, and execution into a formal framework, enabling systematic comparison that was previously infeasible. We will assess each algorithm on reconstruction performance against gold standard pathways, algorithm similarity, and computational performance across different biological contexts. Together, these evaluations will provide quantitative evidence for understanding pathway reconstruction algorithm behavior and guiding algorithm selection.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Reconstructing and comparing signal transduction networks from single cell protein quantification data 93%
- Non-negative Independent Factor Analysis disentangles discrete and continuous sources of variation in scRNA-seq data 92%
- High performance single-cell gene regulatory network inference at scale: The Inferelator 3.0 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Towards inferring causal gene regulatory networks from single cell expression measurements 93%
- Accurate sub-population detection and mapping across single cell experiments with PopCorn 92%
- Accelerated design of Escherichia coli genomes with reduced size using a whole-cell model and machine learning surrogate 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Network- and Enrichment-based Inference of Phenotypes and Targets from large-scale Disease Maps 93%
- Data-driven inference of Boolean networks from transcriptomes to predict cellular differentiation and reprogramming 92%
- A comprehensive mechanistic model of adipocyte signaling with layers of confidence 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.