Epithelial regulatory networks link non-coding genetic variation to clinical heterogeneity in ulcerative colitis
Liu, Y.; Thomas, J. P.; Bohar, B.; Modos, D.; Powell, N.; Paun, A.; Korcsmaros, T.
Show abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a genetically heterogeneous disease causing chronic intestinal inflammation. Genome-wide association studies have linked numerous non-coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to UC, yet how these variants relate to intestinal epithelial function and clinical outcomes remains largely unknown. To address this, we aimed to reconstruct patient-specific epithelial signalling and regulatory networks perturbed by non-coding SNPs and to dissect patient heterogeneity in a large UC phase III trial. We analysed genotype data from 452 participants in the etrolizumab phase III HICKORY cohort using the integrated SNP network platform (iSNP) to map the downstream effects of non-coding SNPs and identify transcription factors (TFs) they perturb in each patient. TFs were filtered to retain those with differential regulatory activity in UC epithelial cells, patients were stratified by these TF profiles, and clusters were correlated with etrolizumab outcomes. We identified 14 SNP-propagated TFs with differential epithelial regulatory activity. Unsupervised clustering stratified patients into subgroups differing in disease severity and treatment response: two clusters had the highest severity and lowest remission and response rates, whereas two others had the best outcomes. iSNP-based clustering improved endoscopic healing prediction (p = 0.03), with trends for clinical response and histological endoscopic mucosal improvement. This systems genomics framework links patient-specific non-coding SNPs to epithelial signalling and regulatory networks in UC and captures clinically meaningful heterogeneity associated with treatment outcomes. It supports genetics-informed precision medicine and improved clinical trial design in inflammatory bowel disease and beyond.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals dysregulated cellular programmes in the inflamed epithelium of Crohn's disease patients. 97%
- Sequencing of over 100,000 individuals identifies multiple genes and rare variants associated with Crohns disease susceptibility 94%
- Chromatin activity at GWAS loci identifies T cell states driving complex immune diseases 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multiomic analysis reveals cellular and epigenetic plasticity in intestinal pouches of ulcerative colitis patients 95%
- A Specialized Epithelial Cell Type Regulating Mucosal Immunity and Driving Human Crohn's Disease 94%
- Sprouty2 limits intestinal tuft and goblet cell numbers through GSK3β-mediated restriction of epithelial IL-33. 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identifying Crohns disease signal from variome analysis 93%
- Multi-centered T cell repertoire profiling identifies novel alterations in the immune repertoire of individuals with inflammatory bowel disease and validates previous findings 92%
- Clinical-grade whole genome sequencing of colorectal cancer and 3-prime transcriptome analysis demonstrate targetable alterations in the majority of patients. 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcriptional Atlas of Ileal-Anal Pouch Immune Cells from Ulcerative Colitis Patients 96%
- Tofacitinib uptake by patient-derived intestinal organoids predicts individual clinical responsiveness 94%
- Prolonged Antibiotic Treatment Generates a Fluoroquinolone Resistant Gut Microbiome and Collateral Multi-Drug Resistance 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systems profiling reveals recurrently dysregulated cytokine signaling responses in ER+ breast cancer patients' blood 89%
- Identifying genes underlying parallel evolution of stromal resistance to placental and cancer invasion 89%
- Supervised machine learning identifies impaired mitochondrial quality control in β cells with development of type 2 diabetes 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.