Deep Learning of Fluorescence Lifetime Imaging Ophthalmoscopy for Type 2 Diabetes Classification
Kwon, S.; Lee, C. S.; Lee, A. Y.; Zhang, L.
Show abstract
Purpose: To evaluate whether fluorescence lifetime imaging ophthalmoscopy (FLIO) combined with deep learning can detect metabolic signatures for classification of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Design: Cross-sectional analysis of participants included AI-READI dataset (version 3) with FLIO imaging and and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) measurement. Subjects: 1,783 participants from the AI-READI dataset (version 3) with HbA1c measurements and FLIO imaging scans (6,912 total): 671 normoglycemic, 726 prediabetic, and 386 diabetic. Methods: Mean fluorescence lifetime maps were generated using a center-of-mass approach and used as inputs to AI models. We trained convolutional neural networks (CNNs), ResNet-18, and XGBoost under three-class (normal, prediabetic, diabetic) and two binary (normal vs. impaired; normal vs. diabetic) classification schemes, using nested 5-fold cross-validation with participant-level grouping. Main Outcome Measures: Macro-averaged accuracy, F1 score, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value (PPV). Results: Group-averaged lifetime maps demonstrated consistent spatial differences across glycemic groups, with progressively longer lifetimes from normal to diabetic participants. The CNN achieved the best overall performance in the 3-class classification (accuracy 0.41 +/- 0.03, F1 score 0.39 +/- 0.02, AUROC 0.58 +/- 0.02), compared to the random classifier for 3-class classification (AUROC = 0.50; accuracy = F1 = 0.33). ResNet-18 and XGBoost showed similar performance (AUROC 0.53-0.58). Confusion matrices revealed substantial overlap between classes, with frequent misclassification toward the prediabetes group. Binary reformulation (normal vs. diabetic) improved performance substantially, with the CNN resulting in AUROC 0.63 +/- 0.02 and XGBoost 0.67 +/- 0.07. Conclusions: FLIO-derived lifetime maps capture metabolic signals associated with glycemic status but yield modest classification performance with current AI models. These findings highlight both the potential and the challenges of using FLIO for early metabolic screening and monitoring, informing future development of clinically applicable imaging biomarkers.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Minimal Correlation but Complementary Diagnostic Utility for Plasma Cell-free RNA and Proteins 87%
- Estimating Heritability of Glycaemic Response to Metformin using Nationwide Electronic Health Records and Population-Sized Pedigree 86%
- A user-friendly tool for cloud-based whole slide image segmentation, with examples from renal histopathology 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Circular functional analysis of OCT data for precise identification of structural phenotypes in the eye 90%
- Intra- and inter-individual metabolic profiling highlights carnitine and lysophosphatidylcholine pathways as key molecular defects in type-2 diabetes 89%
- Longitudinal Intravital Imaging of Biosensor-labeled In Situ Islet Beta Cells 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- tUbe net: a generalisable deep learning tool for 3D vessel segmentation 87%
- A Prospective Cohort Study to Develop Multi-Biomarkers Panel to Define Biological Ageing in Five Different Cohorts from Newborn to Oldest Adult: A Study Protocol 85%
- ImmuNet: A Segmentation-Free Machine Learning Pipeline for Immune Landscape Phenotyping in Tumors by Muliplex Imaging 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optoacoustic skin mesoscopy opens a window to systemic effects of diabetes 86%
- Rapid label-free identification of pathogenic bacteria species from a minute quantity 1 exploiting three-dimensional quantitative phase imaging and artificial neural network 85%
- Bessel Beam Optical Coherence Microscopy Enables Multiscale Assessment of Cerebrovascular Network Morphology and Function 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.