Beyond conventional statistics: Genomic Informational Field Theory (GIFT) identifies sex-specific herpes virus associations in multiple sclerosis
Ahmed, N.; Maple, P.; Tanasescu, R.; Giorgi, L.; Valentino, P.; di Sapio, A.; Gran, B.; Rauch, C.; Kreft, K. L.
Show abstract
Background: Detecting higher order relationships in datasets of complex traits, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), has been challenging. Conventional statistics largely rely on comparing averages across groups and thereby discard important information on the underlying distribution of datapoints. The Genomic Information Field Theory (GIFT) overcomes this limitation by ranking individuals based on linear measures, for example immunoglobulin titres. The exact role of humoral immune responses against several human herpes viruses in a sex-dependent manner in MS is currently unknown. Materials and methods: We compared the performance of GIFT with conventional statistical frameworks to detect differences in the humoral immune response against 4 highly prevalent herpes viruses linked to an individuals susceptibility to develop MS in 200 MS patients and 137 healthy controls. Results: GIFT validated the well-known association that the Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) protein EBNA1 is strongly linked to MS susceptibility in both sexes. In contrast to conventional statistics, GIFT also identified association between herpes simplex virus, varicella zoster virus and the EBV VCA protein and female susceptibility to develop MS, whereas male MS susceptibility was only linked to CMV immunoglobulin levels. None of these associations was observed using conventional statistical tools. Conclusion and discussion: We here show for the first time that GIFT is able to detect novel associations in human immunoglobulin data linked to MS susceptibility, which remained undetected by conventional statistical frameworks. This shows the power of GIFT to detect complex phenotype-trait associations and underlying subgroups within populations.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate classification of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis 92%
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between Epstein-Barr virus, Multiple Sclerosis, and other risk factors 90%
- A susceptibility network analysis of disease trajectories leading to multiple sclerosis: a nationwide cohort study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current status and future opportunities in modeling Multiple Sclerosis clinical characteristics 91%
- Alpha-Linolenic Acid Associations with Disability and Brain Volume in Multiple Sclerosis: A Brief Replication Report 89%
- Matrix and Graphical Representation of the Primary Headache Syndromes in the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD3): A Basis for Automated Diagnosis and Analysis of Criteria. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Brain predictors of fatigue in Rheumatoid Arthritis: a machine learning study 92%
- Personalized Therapy Design for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Based on the Analysis of Protein-Protein Interaction Networks 91%
- Imbalanced Machine Learning Classification Models For Removal Biosimilar Drugs And Increased Activity In Patients With Rheumatic Diseases 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting dengue importation into Europe, using machine learning and model-agnostic methods. 90%
- Artificial intelligence predicts the immunogenic landscape of SARS-CoV-2: toward universal blueprints for vaccine designs 90%
- Uncertainty and Inconsistency of COVID-19 Non-Pharmaceutical Intervention Effects with Multiple Competitive Statistical Models 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank 88%
- The Wood equation allows consistent fitting of individual antibody responses profiles in Zika virus or SARS-CoV-2 infected patients 88%
- Magnetoencephalography-based interpretable automated differential diagnosis in neurodegenerative diseases 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.