Protocol for: mixed methods study on diversity of children with cochlear implants and their families engaging with the BEARS (Both Ears) virtual reality training games: improving clinical trial diversity and scale-up inclusiveness
Cullington, H. E.; Driver, S.; Nightingale, R.; Somerset, S.; Corbett, F.; Jepson, M.; Conefrey, C.; Chauhan, T.; Vickers, D.
Show abstract
Introduction We are currently working on the BEARS (Both Ears) virtual reality (VR) Randomised Controlled Trial. We are recruiting 272 deaf children and young people who use bilateral (both ears) cochlear implants (CI) to examine if using the BEARS VR games helps their hearing in background noise and ultimately their quality of life. Clinical trial participants should be representative of the population with the health condition, although this is rarely achieved in practice as people from ethnic minorities or those from more deprived areas may face barriers to participation. Study Design Mixed methods design Objectives Use a literature review and collection of data from cochlear implant centres to establish the sociodemographic characteristics of deaf children aged 8 to 16 years with bilateral cochlear implants in the United Kingdom (UK). a. Establish the sociodemographic characteristics of the families recruited to the BEARS clinical trial in the first six months, and compare with the age-matched population of deaf children with bilateral cochlear implants in the UK. b. Analyse the BEARS clinical trial pre-screening diversity data. c. Implement an established recruitment intervention method in a workshop to explore and optimise recruitment number and diversity. d. Compare the final six months of recruitment data diversity with the initial six months. Use interviews and focus groups to collect qualitative data from children and their families who chose not to take part in BEARS, clinicians, and family representatives (e.g. teachers) to explore barriers and facilitators to families taking part in BEARS. Amend the BEARS scale-up plan based on new learning. Methods Literature and scoping reviews, quantitative analysis of BEARS recruitment data, in-depth interviews, paired interviews, focus groups Sample size Qualitative sample: 10-15 children aged 8-16 with bilateral CI, 10-15 parents/carers of children with bilateral CI, 10-12 clinicians and 10-12 family representatives. Significance This work will evaluate how diverse the BEARS clinical trial recruitment is and whether it is representative of the UK population of children with bilateral cochlear implants. We will investigate recruitment barriers and implement measures to try to improve recruitment diversity.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- What do blind people "see" with retinal prostheses? Observations and qualitative reports of epiretinal implant users 92%
- Digital thErapy For Improved tiNnitus carE Study (DEFINE): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 92%
- A country-wide health policy in Chile for deaf adults using cochlear implants: analysis of health determinants and social impacts 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adaptive hearing aid benefit in children with mild/moderate hearing loss: A registered, double-blind, randomized clinical trial 92%
- Improving Sensitivity of the Digits-in-Noise Test using Antiphasic Stimuli 91%
- Pinna-Imitating Microphone Directionality Improves Sound Localization and Discrimination in Bilateral Cochlear Implant Users 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Why is implementing remote monitoring in virtual wards (Hospital at Home) for people living with frailty so hard? Qualitative interview study 88%
- Is Point-of-Care testing feasible and safe in care homes in England? An exploratory usability and accuracy evaluation of Point-of-Care Polymerase Chain Reaction test for SARS-COV-2 87%
- Dementia and hearing-aid use: a two-way street 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance of ChatGPT in pediatric audiology as rated by students and experts 91%
- Applicability of a short form of the Speech, Spatial und Qualities of Hearing Scale in 97 individuals with Meniere's disease in a multicentric registry 90%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of bimodal neuromodulation for tinnitus treatment in a real-world clinical setting in United States: A retrospective chart review 89%
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges 87%
- A Comparative Survey of Functional Evidence Use in Hearing and Vision Loss Genetics 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.