Back

Higher Blood-to-Tissue Tumor Mutational Burden Ratio Is Associated With Poorer Overall Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Kim, L.; Kim, J.; Kim, J.; Yoo, S.; Shin, M.; Dos Santos, L. S.; Chae, Y. K.

2026-08-06 oncology
10.64898/2026.08.04.26359280 medRxiv
Show abstract

Introduction: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) is a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, traditionally measured in tissue (tTMB). Blood-based TMB (bTMB), derived from circulating tumor DNA, is minimally invasive but shows modest concordance with tTMB. The significance of blood-tissue TMB discordance remains unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 105 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent pretreatment blood and tissue next-generation sequencing between October 2020 and September 2024. The blood-to-tissue TMB ratio was defined as ln[(1 + bTMB)/(1 + tTMB)]. Outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and multivariable Cox models. Results: Median follow-up was 10 months. Patients in the lowest ratio tertile had longer OS than those in the upper two tertiles (median, 33 vs 11 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32-0.97; p = 0.04), whereas PFS did not differ (HR, 0.89; p = 0.62). A higher ratio, analyzed continuously, was independently associated with shorter OS (HR per 1-unit increase, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.10-2.31; p = 0.01), but not PFS. The association persisted after adjustment for metastatic organ count and radiographic tumor burden. The high-bTMB/low-tTMB subgroup had the poorest OS (HR, 3.17 vs low-bTMB/high-tTMB; p = 0.01). Conclusions: A higher blood-to-tissue TMB ratio was independently associated with worse OS in advanced NSCLC. Directional discordance between bTMB and tTMB may reflect tumor heterogeneity and provide prognostic information beyond either measure alone.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.