From shielding effect to hierarchical structures: a coarse-grained description of diversity
Lui, G. C.; Goyal, S.
Show abstract
The shared trade-off in microbial resource-utilization strategies has been proposed to resolve the paradox of the plankton, which states that the diversity observed in nature greatly exceeds the theoretically predicted upper bound that limits the number of coexisting species to the number of available resources. However, three important aspects remain unaddressed in this line of work. First, trade-offs have been quantified not only for phenotypes associated with alternative resource utilization, but also for other modes of microbial interaction. Second, in natural systems, not all taxa are subjected to the same trade-offs. Third, existing trade-off-based models do not explain the empirically observed clustering of taxa according to functional similarity. Here, we extend the trade-off-based framework to incorporate multiple types of resources. We assume that different subsets of taxa are constrained by distinct sets of trade-offs. Under this framework, our model predicts the emergence of clusters: while taxa with similar strategies can belong to the same cluster, each cluster is sustained by taxa with substantially different strategies. The resulting system supports high diversity with an effectively unlimited number of coexisting taxa, yet can still be described as a low-diversity community in which the number of coexisting functional clusters does not exceed the theoretical upper bound.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The variability spectrum of ecological communities: How common and rare species shape stability patterns 97%
- Multispecies coexistence emerges from pairwise exclusions in communities with competitive hierarchy 96%
- Cooperation increases robustness to ecological disturbance in microbial cross-feeding networks 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.