A comparative genomics framework for identifying historical population bottlenecks using olfactory receptor gene evolution
O'Regan, K.; Ryan, L.; Hughes, G. M.
Show abstract
Population bottlenecks reduce genetic diversity, increase the fixation of deleterious mutations and elevate extinction risk. Identifying lineages experiencing bottlenecks is a key goal of conservation genetics, facilitating the allocation of limited resources to at-risk species. Although whole-genome sequencing has improved bottleneck detection by reconstructing demographic history, these methods often require extensive population sampling, limiting their application. Previous studies of species showing population bottlenecks have reported an increased number of pseudogenes in the olfactory receptor (OR) gene family, however whether such evolutionary dynamics can be used as comparative biomarkers of genomic decline remains unknown. By quantifying the number of lineage-specific duplication and pseudogenization events, we introduce the duplication-to-loss ratio (DLR), a comparative metric exploring the rate at which chemosensory gene loss is offset by the generation of novel receptors. We characterize the chemosensory repertoires of 21 felid species, including species with known historical bottlenecks, to establish the utility of this DLR metric. Subsequently, we evaluate its usage across additional mammalian families, specifically Ursidae and Pinnipedia, to determine its utility beyond Felidae. Our DLR metric recovers several felid species with a history of genomic decline, including cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) and black-footed cat (Felis nigripes), as well as the giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca), polar bear (Ursus maritimus), Hawaiian monk seal (Neomonachus schauinslandi) and northern elephant seal (Mirounga angustirostris). Our results demonstrate the utility of the OR gene repertoire as a scalable, robust biomarker for identifying comparative population decline, prioritising species for conservation genomic investigation using only the reference genome.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Targeted sequence capture outperforms RNA-Seq and degenerate-primer PCR cloning for sequencing the largest mammalian multi-gene family 93%
- Chromosomal-level genome assembly of the scimitar-horned oryx: insights into diversity and demography of a species extinct in the wild 93%
- Next-generation snow leopard population assessment tool: multiplex-PCR SNP panel for individual identification from feces 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Genome assembly and annotation of the olive grass mouse Abrothrix olivacea reveal transcriptomic and cellular adaptations across contrasting biomes 92%
- Genotype likelihoods incorporated in non-linear dimensionality reduction techniques infer fine-scale population genetic structure 92%
- Evolution of the recombination regulator PRDM9 in minke whales 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Genomic erosion through the lens of comparative genomics 94%
- Recent evolutionary history of tigers highlights contrasting roles of genetic drift and selection 91%
- Evolutionary dynamics of the OR gene repertoire in teleost fishes: evidence of an association with changes in olfactory epithelium shape 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.