Back

PhysioMap: an ontology-grounded causal knowledge graph of human physiology

Hoehndorf, R.; SCHOFIELD, P.; Gkoutos, G. V.

2026-08-07 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.03.742471 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Computational physiology needs representations that connect traits across biological scales while distinguishing causal, constitutive, and mathematical dependencies. We present PhysioMap, an ontology-grounded knowledge base of contextualized physiological traits and precisely defined relation types. A versioned projection maps entailed ontology patterns to a typed causal knowledge graph that constrains quantitative structural causal models. Derivative signs provide a separate qualitative abstraction, which the PhysioMap solver uses to analyze steady-state responses in the presence of feedback. A stratified expert review across all relation types supported most sampled relations and isolated a minority for correction or further investigation. In a rare metabolic disease application, nearly all determinate predictions agreed with the HPO-derived reference before post-hoc review; after the discordant reference directions were excluded, all remaining determinate predictions agreed. Shortest signed paths produced directional errors, particularly on cases for which the PhysioMap solver did not determine a direction, indicating that its abstentions concentrated difficult cases. Abduction usually narrowed the candidate set but often did not identify a unique cause. PhysioMap therefore connects ontology-grounded physiological content to interventional prediction and abduction under incomplete quantitative knowledge. Because PhysioMap curation and the HPO-derived reference may share supporting literature, and because abduction used a closed candidate pool, these analyses do not constitute independent clinical validation.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.