Back

VariantFlux: A genotype-first modelling workflow for predicting the impact of genetic variations on human metabolism

Nazem-Bokaee, H.

2026-08-09 systems biology
10.64898/2026.08.03.740213 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Human genetic variation is a major determinant of organ metabolism, yet how naturally occurring variants shape quantitative metabolic phenotypes remains unclear. We present VariantFlux, a workflow that integrates ancestry-aware variant interpretation into genome-scale metabolic modelling to generate personalised, variant-constrained kidney reconstructions. Using the Human1 v1.19 model, we built a kidney-specific baseline model constrained by 482 metabolites and analysed 2,547 individuals from the 1000 Genomes Project, in whom [~]50% of metabolic genes were predicted damaging by at least three computational tools. These variants, whose burden differed subtly across ancestries, were translated into gene-dosage-anchored flux constraints for homozygous knockouts and graded heterozygous knockdowns. Despite widespread perturbation, >97% of models preserved baseline growth, indicating strong metabolic robustness. Yet individual genomes exhibited distinct flux-rewiring patterns, with frequent individual-specific gain-of-flux events and fewer shared loss-of-flux reactions. Limited ancestry clustering suggests metabolic responses are driven mainly by unique variant combinations. VariantFlux links human genomes to organ-level flux phenotypes, enabling precision medicine, pharmacogenomics, and disease risk prediction. Conceptual advanceWe present VariantFlux, a genotype-first framework that integrates predicted variant effects directly into genome-scale metabolic networks to generate personalised, organ-specific flux phenotypes. Unlike association-based metabolomics studies, this bottom-up approach enables exploratory, mechanistic prediction of how naturally occurring genetic variation reshapes human metabolism.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.